DuckDB lifetimes #6620

Performance Regression: -27.45%

❌ 4 regressed benchmarks
✅ 949 untouched benchmarks
⏩ 1459 skipped benchmarks¹

⚠️ Please fix the performance issues or acknowledge them on CodSpeed.

	Mode	Benchmark	`BASE`	`HEAD`	Efficiency
❌	Simulation	`take_map[(0.1, 0.1)]`	925.7 µs	1,091.7 µs	-15.2%
❌	Simulation	`take_map[(0.1, 0.05)]`	769.8 µs	865 µs	-11%
❌	Simulation	`take_map[(0.1, 0.5)]`	2.1 ms	2.6 ms	-19.88%
❌	Simulation	`take_map[(0.1, 1.0)]`	3.5 ms	4.9 ms	-27.45%

_{Comparing ji/ngates/duckdb-lifetimes (7e29785) with develop (99f2ce2)}

1459 benchmarks were skipped, so the baseline results were used instead. If they were deleted from the codebase, click here and archive them to remove them from the performance reports. ↩