Skip to content

fix: missed notebook contents!#197

Merged
beckermr merged 10 commits intomainfrom
moffat-perf-maxk
Feb 18, 2026
Merged

fix: missed notebook contents!#197
beckermr merged 10 commits intomainfrom
moffat-perf-maxk

Conversation

@beckermr
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Grrrr I missed this commit.

@beckermr beckermr marked this pull request as ready for review February 18, 2026 12:47
@beckermr beckermr merged commit b47e400 into main Feb 18, 2026
7 checks passed
@beckermr beckermr deleted the moffat-perf-maxk branch February 18, 2026 12:47
@codspeed-hq
Copy link
Copy Markdown

codspeed-hq bot commented Feb 18, 2026

Merging this PR will improve performance by 60.09%

⚠️ Unknown Walltime execution environment detected

Using the Walltime instrument on standard Hosted Runners will lead to inconsistent data.

For the most accurate results, we recommend using CodSpeed Macro Runners: bare-metal machines fine-tuned for performance measurement consistency.

⚡ 3 improved benchmarks
✅ 33 untouched benchmarks

Performance Changes

Mode Benchmark BASE HEAD Efficiency
Simulation test_benchmarks_lanczos_interp[kval-no_conserve_dc-run] 432.9 µs 290 µs +49.27%
Simulation test_benchmark_moffat_init[run] 491.8 µs 360.5 µs +36.43%
WallTime test_benchmark_moffat_init[run] 135.9 µs 84.9 µs +60.09%

Comparing moffat-perf-maxk (65d910b) with main (51df286)1

Open in CodSpeed

Footnotes

  1. No successful run was found on main (e241e76) during the generation of this report, so 51df286 was used instead as the comparison base. There might be some changes unrelated to this pull request in this report.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant