Skip to content

Fix upperseq definition in Example_6_4_9#472

Open
Shaunticlair wants to merge 3 commits intoteorth:mainfrom
Shaunticlair:patch-1
Open

Fix upperseq definition in Example_6_4_9#472
Shaunticlair wants to merge 3 commits intoteorth:mainfrom
Shaunticlair:patch-1

Conversation

@Shaunticlair
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

This minus sign shouldn't be here, I don't think. 1. it would properly mirror lowerseq 2. the sup should always be the next positive term.

This minus sign shouldn't be here, I don't think. 1. it would better mirror lowerseq 2. the largest term should always be the next positive one.
@Shaunticlair Shaunticlair marked this pull request as draft March 27, 2026 10:48
Example_6_4_9.limsup showed up twice previously, the second instance looked like it should contextually be Example_6_4_10.limsup
@Shaunticlair Shaunticlair marked this pull request as ready for review March 27, 2026 10:49
@Shaunticlair
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Not sure why it's failing to build? The changes I made don't seem erroneous.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@rkirov rkirov left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants