style: remove extra trailing newlines

[Planeshifter]

Description

Propagating fixes merged to develop between b04b44547c (2026-06-20 14:32 PDT) and e6e7d42b10 (2026-06-21 02:36 PDT) to sibling packages.

This pull request:

• Removes the extra trailing blank line at EOF from 22 Makefiles under math/base/special/* and one Makefile under stats/base/dists/halfnormal/logpdf that exhibit the identical EOF pattern fixed in 50a34cff (style: remove extra trailing newlines). The source commit removed a single trailing blank line from five files under stats/base/dists/planck; the same one-byte fix applies verbatim here. Targets — all 23 ending .PHONY: clean\n\n (or, for halfnormal/logpdf/benchmark/c/Makefile, \n\n\n):

  • @stdlib/math/base/special/acos/src/Makefile
  • @stdlib/math/base/special/acosd/src/Makefile
  • @stdlib/math/base/special/acosdf/src/Makefile
  • @stdlib/math/base/special/acosh/src/Makefile
  • @stdlib/math/base/special/acoshf/src/Makefile
  • @stdlib/math/base/special/asinh/src/Makefile
  • @stdlib/math/base/special/asinhf/src/Makefile
  • @stdlib/math/base/special/atan/src/Makefile
  • @stdlib/math/base/special/atan2/src/Makefile
  • @stdlib/math/base/special/atan2d/src/Makefile
  • @stdlib/math/base/special/atanh/src/Makefile
  • @stdlib/math/base/special/besselj1/src/Makefile
  • @stdlib/math/base/special/cosh/src/Makefile
  • @stdlib/math/base/special/coshf/src/Makefile
  • @stdlib/math/base/special/erf/src/Makefile
  • @stdlib/math/base/special/erfc/src/Makefile
  • @stdlib/math/base/special/erfcinv/src/Makefile
  • @stdlib/math/base/special/erfcx/src/Makefile
  • @stdlib/math/base/special/erfinv/src/Makefile
  • @stdlib/math/base/special/kernel-cos/benchmark/c/native/Makefile
  • @stdlib/math/base/special/kernel-sincos/benchmark/c/native/Makefile
  • @stdlib/math/base/special/kernel-sincosf/benchmark/c/native/Makefile
  • @stdlib/stats/base/dists/halfnormal/logpdf/benchmark/c/Makefile

  Each file now ends with exactly one \n, conforming to the repository-wide insert_final_newline = true and trim_trailing_whitespace = true .editorconfig directives.

Related Issues

None.

Questions

No.

Other

Generated by an automated fix-propagation routine over the 15 commits merged to develop in the 24h window ending 2026-06-21. Four other source commits were inspected and dropped during pattern specification or pre-validation:

• 1f05813f (docs: fix note — t-entropy v < 0 → v <= 0) — sibling t-distribution packages either already use <= semantics or are validly defined at v = 0 (e.g. t/median, t/mode return 0.0 at v = 0), so the doc-text correction does not apply.
• b3383d13 (fix: use correct element type — typedndarray<number> → typedndarray<unknown> for the generic gindex-of-falsy) — the only direct-parameter sibling (gindex-of-truthy) is already on <unknown>; remaining g-prefixed packages legitimately constrain elements to number for sum/cumsum/axpy arithmetic.
• 7f1c224c (docs: update descriptions — anglit/mean Greek symbols, σ > 0 constraint, Evaluates → Returns) — the only anglit sibling (anglit/median) already carries both edits.
• 5c56631c (test: fix mismatched test filenames) and 7f87b929 (chore: fix JavaScript lint errors) — no concrete grep-able search signature; dropped at pattern specification.

Validation

Two independent opus validation passes verified each target file ends with at least one trailing blank line after .PHONY: clean, carries no Do not manually edit / AUTOGENERATED marker, and is not the artifact of a template generator. A sonnet style-consistency pass sampled 20 sibling Makefiles and the root .editorconfig to confirm "single newline at EOF" is the dominant convention. Deliberately excluded from this PR:

• gypi/Makefile files under other namespaces that did not exhibit the trailing-blank-line pattern (scan covered 4,926 Makefiles and 1,500 include.gypi files repo-wide).
• Source commits whose pattern produced zero confirmed propagation sites after sibling-package inspection (see "Other" above).

Checklist

• Read, understood, and followed the contributing guidelines.

AI Assistance

• Yes
• No

If you answered "yes" above, how did you use AI assistance?

• Code generation (e.g., when writing an implementation or fixing a bug)
• Test/benchmark generation
• Documentation (including examples)
• Research and understanding

Disclosure

This PR was authored by Claude Code on behalf of @Planeshifter as an automated propagation of fixes merged to develop over the prior 24 hours. Candidate source commits were filtered for generalizable patterns, sibling sites located via grep-able pattern signatures, and each proposed patch independently validated by parallel reviewer agents before commits were applied in the primary worktree. A human will audit and promote the PR out of draft.

---

@stdlib-js/reviewers

---

Generated by Claude Code

[stdlib-bot]

Coverage Report

Package	Statements	Branches	Functions	Lines
math/base/special/acos	$\\color{green}217/217$ $\\color{green}+100.00\\%$	$\\color{green}12/12$ $\\color{green}+100.00\\%$	$\\color{green}2/2$ $\\color{green}+100.00\\%$	$\\color{green}217/217$ $\\color{green}+100.00\\%$
math/base/special/acosd	$\\color{green}177/177$ $\\color{green}+100.00\\%$	$\\color{green}5/5$ $\\color{green}+100.00\\%$	$\\color{green}2/2$ $\\color{green}+100.00\\%$	$\\color{green}177/177$ $\\color{green}+100.00\\%$
math/base/special/acosdf	$\\color{green}185/185$ $\\color{green}+100.00\\%$	$\\color{green}5/5$ $\\color{green}+100.00\\%$	$\\color{green}2/2$ $\\color{green}+100.00\\%$	$\\color{green}185/185$ $\\color{green}+100.00\\%$
math/base/special/acosh	$\\color{green}217/217$ $\\color{green}+100.00\\%$	$\\color{green}14/14$ $\\color{green}+100.00\\%$	$\\color{green}2/2$ $\\color{green}+100.00\\%$	$\\color{green}217/217$ $\\color{green}+100.00\\%$
math/base/special/acoshf	$\\color{green}226/226$ $\\color{green}+100.00\\%$	$\\color{green}14/14$ $\\color{green}+100.00\\%$	$\\color{green}2/2$ $\\color{green}+100.00\\%$	$\\color{green}226/226$ $\\color{green}+100.00\\%$
math/base/special/asinh	$\\color{green}235/235$ $\\color{green}+100.00\\%$	$\\color{green}19/19$ $\\color{green}+100.00\\%$	$\\color{green}2/2$ $\\color{green}+100.00\\%$	$\\color{green}235/235$ $\\color{green}+100.00\\%$
math/base/special/asinhf	$\\color{green}245/245$ $\\color{green}+100.00\\%$	$\\color{green}19/19$ $\\color{green}+100.00\\%$	$\\color{green}2/2$ $\\color{green}+100.00\\%$	$\\color{green}245/245$ $\\color{green}+100.00\\%$
math/base/special/atan	$\\color{green}346/346$ $\\color{green}+100.00\\%$	$\\color{green}33/33$ $\\color{green}+100.00\\%$	$\\color{green}4/4$ $\\color{green}+100.00\\%$	$\\color{green}346/346$ $\\color{green}+100.00\\%$
math/base/special/atan2	$\\color{green}290/290$ $\\color{green}+100.00\\%$	$\\color{green}26/26$ $\\color{green}+100.00\\%$	$\\color{green}2/2$ $\\color{green}+100.00\\%$	$\\color{green}290/290$ $\\color{green}+100.00\\%$
math/base/special/atan2d	$\\color{green}192/192$ $\\color{green}+100.00\\%$	$\\color{green}5/5$ $\\color{green}+100.00\\%$	$\\color{green}2/2$ $\\color{green}+100.00\\%$	$\\color{green}192/192$ $\\color{green}+100.00\\%$
math/base/special/atanh	$\\color{green}248/248$ $\\color{green}+100.00\\%$	$\\color{green}24/24$ $\\color{green}+100.00\\%$	$\\color{green}2/2$ $\\color{green}+100.00\\%$	$\\color{green}248/248$ $\\color{green}+100.00\\%$
math/base/special/besselj1	$\\color{red}507/515$ $\\color{green}+98.45\\%$	$\\color{red}42/48$ $\\color{green}+87.50\\%$	$\\color{green}6/6$ $\\color{green}+100.00\\%$	$\\color{red}507/515$ $\\color{green}+98.45\\%$
math/base/special/cosh	$\\color{green}203/203$ $\\color{green}+100.00\\%$	$\\color{green}11/11$ $\\color{green}+100.00\\%$	$\\color{green}2/2$ $\\color{green}+100.00\\%$	$\\color{green}203/203$ $\\color{green}+100.00\\%$
math/base/special/coshf	$\\color{green}217/217$ $\\color{green}+100.00\\%$	$\\color{green}12/12$ $\\color{green}+100.00\\%$	$\\color{green}2/2$ $\\color{green}+100.00\\%$	$\\color{green}217/217$ $\\color{green}+100.00\\%$
math/base/special/erf	$\\color{red}870/882$ $\\color{green}+98.64\\%$	$\\color{red}52/58$ $\\color{green}+89.66\\%$	$\\color{green}10/10$ $\\color{green}+100.00\\%$	$\\color{red}870/882$ $\\color{green}+98.64\\%$
math/base/special/erfc	$\\color{red}895/907$ $\\color{green}+98.68\\%$	$\\color{red}55/61$ $\\color{green}+90.16\\%$	$\\color{green}10/10$ $\\color{green}+100.00\\%$	$\\color{red}895/907$ $\\color{green}+98.68\\%$
math/base/special/erfcinv	$\\color{red}630/659$ $\\color{green}+95.60\\%$	$\\color{red}43/56$ $\\color{green}+76.79\\%$	$\\color{green}7/7$ $\\color{green}+100.00\\%$	$\\color{red}630/659$ $\\color{green}+95.60\\%$
math/base/special/erfcx	$\\color{red}1368/1443$ $\\color{green}+94.80\\%$	$\\color{green}95/95$ $\\color{green}+100.00\\%$	$\\color{red}79/104$ $\\color{green}+75.96\\%$	$\\color{red}1368/1443$ $\\color{green}+94.80\\%$
math/base/special/erfinv	$\\color{red}648/677$ $\\color{green}+95.72\\%$	$\\color{red}43/56$ $\\color{green}+76.79\\%$	$\\color{green}7/7$ $\\color{green}+100.00\\%$	$\\color{red}648/677$ $\\color{green}+95.72\\%$
math/base/special/kernel-cos	$\\color{red}326/330$ $\\color{green}+98.79\\%$	$\\color{red}9/11$ $\\color{green}+81.82\\%$	$\\color{green}4/4$ $\\color{green}+100.00\\%$	$\\color{red}326/330$ $\\color{green}+98.79\\%$
math/base/special/kernel-sincos	$\\color{red}395/403$ $\\color{green}+98.01\\%$	$\\color{red}15/19$ $\\color{green}+78.95\\%$	$\\color{green}6/6$ $\\color{green}+100.00\\%$	$\\color{red}395/403$ $\\color{green}+98.01\\%$
math/base/special/kernel-sincosf	$\\color{green}413/413$ $\\color{green}+100.00\\%$	$\\color{green}19/19$ $\\color{green}+100.00\\%$	$\\color{green}6/6$ $\\color{green}+100.00\\%$	$\\color{green}413/413$ $\\color{green}+100.00\\%$
stats/base/dists/halfnormal/logpdf	$\\color{red}303/305$ $\\color{green}+99.34\\%$	$\\color{red}19/20$ $\\color{green}+95.00\\%$	$\\color{green}4/4$ $\\color{green}+100.00\\%$	$\\color{red}303/305$ $\\color{green}+99.34\\%$

The above coverage report was generated for the changes in this PR.