Conversation
Contributor
Author
|
@joncinque Not sure whether we should replace the current IDL or not. |
febo
commented
Mar 30, 2026
febo
commented
Mar 30, 2026
lorisleiva
previously approved these changes
Mar 30, 2026
Member
lorisleiva
left a comment
lorisleiva
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Just a few small comments but looks great!
joncinque
reviewed
Mar 30, 2026
Contributor
joncinque
left a comment
joncinque
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Looks good to me with Loris's suggestions!
joncinque
approved these changes
Mar 30, 2026
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
3 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Problem
p-tokenincludes 3 new instructions that are not present in SPL Token IDL file.Solution
Create an IDL file for p-token.