Correctly handle Deref specialization in rustdoc#157272
Open
GuillaumeGomez wants to merge 1 commit into
Open
Conversation
rustbot
added
S-waiting-on-review
Member
|
I also have no idea how we should handle Do we even want to show an |
Urgau
added
S-waiting-on-author
Contributor
|
☔ The latest upstream changes (presumably #159623) made this pull request unmergeable. Please resolve the merge conflicts by rebasing. |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
3 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Fixes #156484.
Not sure if this is the right way to handle specialization though as it doesn't provide more information as you can see:
But at least it doesn't panic anymore.
r? @Urgau