Add docs for field default values#1766
Conversation
|
cc @estebank |
|
@bluebear94: You've been contributing a number of things recently. Thanks for that. We're on the spec call at the moment, and would be interested in talking more with you. If you're able to join us on Zulip, that'd be great. You can then reach out to |
|
@estebank In particular, I'm curious what the status of this feature is in terms of how close it is to stabilization? Is this something you can help with review? I'm generally shy from doing reviews if there are still changes forthcoming, and I have no context on this feature. |
compiler-errors
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
From a compiler perspective, it's probably still worth baking the feature for some time, since it's still pretty new implementation-wise. But I don't think it's going to change much, so it's probably fine to keep this open and tagged as waiting for stabilization and revisit it for tweaks when the stabilization happens.
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
252b208 to
9e4a554
Compare
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
9e4a554 to
760338b
Compare
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
3011603 to
453d6d2
Compare
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
453d6d2 to
9241faa
Compare
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
|
This PR collides with existing undocumented syntax for rest-patterns in assignee expressions. See #2208 |
9241faa to
baa53ae
Compare
|
This PR was rebased onto a different master commit. Here's a range-diff highlighting what actually changed. Rebasing is a normal part of keeping PRs up to date, so no action is needed—this note is just to help reviewers. |
baa53ae to
56f7ea7
Compare
Tracking issue: rust-lang/rust#132162