[INC-285] Inner workflows#2230
Conversation
… maximum subworkflow depth
- Introduced UseSubworkflowBlockV1 to enable execution of embedded workflows with parameter mapping from the parent workflow. - Updated loader.py to include the new block in the workflow loading process. - Added constants for the new block type in constants.py.
- Updated ExecutionEngineV1 to initialize LocalSubworkflowRunner if not already provided in init_parameters. - Enhanced LocalSubworkflowRunner to execute nested workflows using the v1 workflow executor. - Improved documentation for subworkflow components to clarify usage and implementation details.
- Introduced new functions for compiling and validating nested workflows within the execution engine. - Added `GraphCompilationResult` class to encapsulate compilation results. - Enhanced `compile_workflow` to handle nested workflows and their parameters. - Created `compiler_bridge.py` for subworkflow composition validation and output projection. - Updated existing workflow compilation logic to integrate subworkflow handling.
- Introduced new functions for executing `use_subworkflow` steps, including `run_use_subworkflow_simd` and `run_use_subworkflow_non_simd`. - Added utility functions to determine if a step is a subworkflow and to manage runtime parameters. - Enhanced the main execution engine to support error handling for subworkflow steps. - Created a new file for subworkflow step execution logic, improving modularity and maintainability.
- Introduced end-to-end tests for the `use_subworkflow` functionality, validating parameter mapping between parent and child workflows. - Implemented tests for both single-level and multi-level nested workflows to ensure correct execution and output. - Enhanced test coverage for the execution engine's handling of subworkflows, contributing to improved reliability and maintainability of the workflow system.
- Introduced `nested_output_dimensionality_lift` to `BlockManifest` for tracking output dimensionality from child steps in embedded workflows. - Updated `denote_data_flow_for_step` to incorporate the new lift value when determining output dimensionality offsets. - Implemented `max_projection_output_lift_from_embedded_workflow` to calculate the maximum lift from child steps. - Enhanced the `LocalSubworkflowRunner` and related execution functions to utilize the new dimensionality handling. - Added utility functions for reshaping results based on the nested output dimensionality lift during execution. - Expanded integration tests to validate the new functionality and ensure correct behavior in nested workflows.
- Added support for resolving `use_subworkflow` steps that reference saved workflows by ID into inline `embedded_workflow` definitions. - Introduced a new module for reference resolution, including a default resolver for fetching workflow specifications. - Updated the compilation process to normalize references before parsing and validation, ensuring mutual exclusivity between embedded workflows and reference fields. - Expanded integration and unit tests to cover new reference resolution features, validating correct behavior in various scenarios.
…onality - Renamed `use_subworkflow` to `use_inner_workflow` throughout the codebase for consistency. - Introduced a new document detailing the design and goals of inner workflow composition. - Updated compilation and execution logic to support inner workflows, including validation of composition and nesting depth. - Enhanced error handling for inner workflow composition issues, including cycle detection and nesting depth limits. - Added new modules for inner workflow management, including reference resolution and execution strategies. - Updated environment variables to reflect the new inner workflow terminology, ensuring backward compatibility with legacy subworkflow settings.
- Removed legacy references to `workflows_core.subworkflow_spec_resolver` in favor of the updated `workflows_core.inner_workflow_spec_resolver`. - Enhanced documentation for the `use_subworkflow` functionality, clarifying the usage of inline definitions and workspace configurations. - Streamlined error messages related to workflow resolution, ensuring clarity in user feedback.
- Renamed `use_subworkflow` to `inner_workflow` throughout the codebase for consistency and clarity. - Introduced a new `InnerWorkflowBlockV1` class to handle execution of nested workflows with parameter mapping. - Updated documentation to reflect changes in terminology and provide clear guidelines on inner workflow composition. - Enhanced compilation and execution logic to support inner workflows, including validation of parameter bindings and nesting depth. - Improved error handling for inner workflow references and added integration tests to validate functionality.
- Updated documentation to clarify the `max_nesting_depth` environment variable, removing references to the legacy `WORKFLOWS_MAX_SUBWORKFLOW_DEPTH`. - Streamlined the execution engine to exclusively utilize `workflows_core.inner_workflow_runner`, eliminating fallback to the legacy runner. - Enhanced the inner workflow step execution logic by removing deprecated references and ensuring consistency in the handling of nested workflows. - Improved code clarity and maintainability by consolidating inner workflow runner logic.
- Introduced a new integration test file for `roboflow_core/inner_workflow@v1`, validating nested workflow execution. - Implemented tests to ensure correct parameter mapping and output resolution between parent and child workflows. - Enhanced documentation to include the new test file in the inner workflow design overview.
- Renamed `embedded_workflow` references to `workflow` throughout the codebase for consistency and clarity. - Updated documentation to reflect changes in parameter names and improve clarity on workflow execution. - Enhanced validation logic to ensure correct handling of workflow references and inline definitions. - Adjusted integration and unit tests to align with the new terminology and validate functionality of inner workflows.
…tion` - Renamed all instances of `workflow` to `workflow_definition` across the codebase for consistency and clarity. - Adjusted validation logic and error messages to reflect the new terminology. - Updated integration and unit tests to ensure proper functionality with the new parameter name. - Enhanced documentation to clarify the changes in parameter handling for inner workflows.
- Updated variable names from `embedded` to `inner` for clarity and consistency in the inner workflow test cases. - Ensured that all references to workflow definitions in the tests align with the updated terminology. - Improved readability of the test code by standardizing naming conventions across multiple test functions.
- Introduced multiple test cases to validate the equivalence between nested inner workflows and their inlined counterparts. - Implemented tests for various scenarios, including parameter passing, output resolution, and handling of batch inputs. - Ensured consistency in behavior between inner workflows and inlined steps, enhancing the robustness of the integration testing framework. - Updated common helper functions to support the new test cases and improve code reusability.
- Deleted the test file `test_workflow_with_inner_workflow.py`, which contained end-to-end tests for nested workflow execution. - This removal is part of a cleanup effort to streamline the testing framework and eliminate redundant or outdated test cases. - Future tests will focus on more relevant scenarios and improve overall test coverage.
- Deleted the `inner_workflow_design.md` file, which outlined the design and goals for nested workflows. - This removal is part of a broader effort to streamline documentation and focus on more relevant and updated resources. - Future documentation will prioritize clarity and conciseness in conveying workflow functionality.
- Deleted the section on inner workflow composition from the `workflows_compiler.md` file to streamline documentation. - This change aligns with recent efforts to focus on more relevant and updated resources regarding workflow functionality.
| - Workflow Execution: workflows/workflow_execution.md | ||
| - Kinds: workflows/kinds/ | ||
| - Compiler: workflows/workflows_compiler.md | ||
| - Inner workflow design: workflows/inner_workflow_design.md |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
looks like this file is not commited
| Largest positive ``get_output_dimensionality_offset()`` among child steps referenced | ||
| by the child workflow's JsonField outputs (e.g. ``dynamic_crop`` -> 1). | ||
| """ | ||
| from inference.core.workflows.execution_engine.v1.compiler.entities import StepNode |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
is there an issue with global imports here? I guess circular dependencies, right?
|
|
||
| lift = 0 | ||
| graph = child_graph.execution_graph | ||
| for jf in child_graph.parsed_workflow_definition.outputs: |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
voting for more descriptive var names
| For each ``inner_workflow`` step, compile the child workflow (for cache + output kinds) | ||
| and attach resolved_child_outputs on the manifest copy. | ||
| """ | ||
| from inference.core.workflows.execution_engine.v1.compiler.entities import ( |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
if symbol ParsedWorkflowDefinition is present at the signature level - why internal imports?
| """Errors raised by inner-workflow composition validation.""" | ||
|
|
||
|
|
||
| class InnerWorkflowCompositionError(Exception): |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
maybe some generic workflow-related error could be on top of error hierarchy here
| context="workflow_execution | inner_workflow", | ||
| ) | ||
| if len(raw) != 1: | ||
| raise ExecutionEngineRuntimeError( |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
isnt that assumption error? I mean the safeguard for limitations / assumptions rather that "something wrong which happened in runtime"?
| ) | ||
| inner = echo_child_workflow() | ||
|
|
||
| with mock.patch.object(ModelManager, "add_model"), mock.patch.object( |
| nested_engine = execution_engine( | ||
| model_manager, | ||
| _nested_by_ref_workflow(), | ||
| extra_init_parameters={WORKFLOWS_CORE_INNER_WORKFLOW_SPEC_RESOLVER: resolver}, |
- Updated multiple integration tests to replace instances of `first_non_empty_or_default` with `scalar_only_echo`, ensuring uniformity in the workflow steps. - Adjusted test documentation to reflect the changes in step types and their expected behavior. - This refactor enhances the clarity and maintainability of the test suite for inner workflows.
…rst non-empty - Deleted the test file `test_inner_workflow_continue_if_last_in_inner_with_parent_first_non_empty.py`, which validated the behavior of the inner workflow when using `continue_if` with a parent workflow's `first_non_empty_or_default` step. - This removal is part of ongoing efforts to streamline the testing framework and eliminate outdated or redundant test cases.
- Updated integration tests to change references from `first_non_empty` to `echo` in both the workflow definitions and output selectors. - This change enhances consistency across the test cases and aligns with recent refactoring efforts to standardize step types in inner workflows.
- Introduced a new test case to validate the behavior of the inner workflow when the parent runs detection and applies dynamic cropping on the inner model's predictions. - Added a new function `child_detection_only_for_parent_dynamic_crop` to define the inner workflow structure for this scenario. - This enhancement improves the integration testing framework by ensuring the correctness of nested workflows involving detection and cropping operations.
- Updated the inner workflow implementation to validate parameter bindings and inline child workflows at compile time, enhancing performance and simplifying execution. - Removed the `InnerWorkflowRunner` and related execution logic, as inner workflows are now expanded into ordinary steps during compilation. - Adjusted documentation and comments to reflect the new inlining behavior and updated parameter binding requirements. - Added tests to validate the new parameter binding rules for child workflows, ensuring robustness in the compilation process.
- Refactored the test suite to introduce a new mock function for object detection inference, improving the handling of single and batch image requests. - Added a new test case to validate the behavior of the inner workflow when processing a list of images, ensuring consistent results with the single-image case. - Updated assertions to verify the correct number of calls and parameters in the mock, enhancing the robustness of the integration tests for nested workflows.
- Introduced two new test cases to validate the behavior of the inner workflow when using `continue_if` with the outer workflow's `echo` step. - Enhanced the `_inner_continue_if_only_outer_echo_name_matches_parent` and `_nested_workflow_continue_if_inner_echo_outer` functions to support the new test scenarios. - Updated assertions to ensure the correctness of the integration tests, verifying that the nested and flat workflow results match as expected.
…etections - Introduced a new test case to validate the behavior of the inner workflow when applying dimension collapse on object detection results from the inner model. - Implemented mock functions to simulate object detection responses and ensure consistent results when processing single and batch images. - Enhanced assertions to verify that the nested and flat workflow results match, confirming the correctness of the integration tests for dimension collapse functionality.
- Introduced a new inner workflow function `child_dimension_collapse_from_parent_detections` to handle dimension collapse using predictions from the parent workflow. - Added a comprehensive integration test to validate the behavior of the inner workflow when applying dimension collapse on object detection results. - Implemented mock functions to simulate object detection responses and ensure consistent results for both single and batch image processing. - Enhanced assertions to confirm that the results from the nested and flat workflows match, ensuring the correctness of the integration tests for dimension collapse functionality.
- Updated the inner workflow validation logic to improve error handling for invalid step entries and parameter bindings. - Introduced new error classes for better granularity in error reporting, including `InnerWorkflowInvalidStepEntryError` and `InnerWorkflowParameterBindingsError`. - Refactored the `validate_inner_workflow_composition_from_raw_workflow_definition` function to enhance clarity and maintainability. - Adjusted the maximum nesting depth configuration for inner workflows and updated related validation checks. - Added unit tests to ensure robust validation of inner workflow definitions and parameter bindings.
- Added detailed docstrings to several functions in the inline workflow module, improving clarity on their purpose, parameters, and error handling. - Updated function descriptions to include information about exceptions raised, enhancing the usability and maintainability of the code. - This change aims to provide better guidance for developers working with inner workflows and facilitate easier debugging and integration.
- Introduced new unit tests for the `inline_inner_workflow_steps` function, focusing on its behavior with minimal workflow graphs. - Added comprehensive test cases to validate the handling of inner workflow steps, ensuring correct inlining and reference resolution. - Enhanced the test suite for the inner workflow module to improve coverage and maintainability, facilitating easier debugging and integration in future developments. - This addition aims to strengthen the testing framework for inner workflows and ensure robust functionality across various scenarios.
|
|
||
| def _workflow_identity_fingerprint(raw_workflow_definition: Dict[str, Any]) -> str: | ||
| """Stable opaque id for composition graph nodes.""" | ||
| payload = json.dumps(raw_workflow_definition, sort_keys=True, separators=(",", ":")).encode( |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
this is just to leave comment and check later
I worry that some workflow definition may carry base64 images - at least I remember (maybe phantom memory) some iteration of UI doing so - this way, we will run excessive computation in some cases for the things not directly being meaningful part of workflow definition
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Ok, written a note to myself
- Updated the `_contains_inner_workflow_step` function to return `False` for invalid input types instead of raising exceptions, improving usability and error handling. - Modified corresponding unit tests to reflect the new behavior, ensuring that non-list and non-dict entries are correctly handled without exceptions. - This change enhances the robustness of the inner workflow validation process and simplifies error management for users.
- Reformatted several code sections across multiple files to enhance readability, including consistent line breaks and indentation. - Updated the `validate_workflow_or_reference` method to improve clarity in the inline workflow validation process. - Refactored function calls to maintain a consistent style, ensuring better maintainability and understanding of the codebase. - These changes aim to streamline the inner workflow implementation and facilitate easier future modifications.
- Introduced a new environment variable `WORKFLOWS_MAX_INNER_WORKFLOW_COUNT` to set the maximum allowed inner workflow steps. - Added `InnerWorkflowTotalCountError` to handle cases where the inner workflow step count exceeds the defined limit. - Updated the `validate_inner_workflow_composition` function to include validation for the total count of inner workflow steps. - Enhanced unit tests to cover scenarios for total count validation, ensuring robust error handling and compliance with the new limits. - These changes improve the overall validation logic for inner workflows, enhancing usability and error management.
|
ok, one more thing - bump of EE version and mention in changelog |
- Introduced the `roboflow_core/inner_workflow@v1` block, allowing workflows to embed other workflows inline. - Updated the execution engine to version `1.9.0`, incorporating compile-time inlining of nested workflows. - Added a new documentation page detailing inner workflows, including usage, parameter bindings, and compile-time validation. - Enhanced the workflows compiler to handle inner workflow steps, ensuring proper validation and inlining during compilation. - Updated existing documentation to reference the new inner workflow design and its capabilities.
What does this PR do?
Linked issue: INC-285
roboflow_core/inner_workflow@v1allowing to nest a previously saved workflow by providing it'sworkflow_id,workspace_idandversionget_workflow_specificationto fetch the inner workflows recursively and normalize them to a full workflow definitionTesting
Test details:
Checklist
Additional Context