Skip to content

COO-1863: korrel8r is not being passed the new TLS arguments#1126

Open
alanconway wants to merge 1 commit into
rhobs:mainfrom
alanconway:korrel8r-tls-flags
Open

COO-1863: korrel8r is not being passed the new TLS arguments#1126
alanconway wants to merge 1 commit into
rhobs:mainfrom
alanconway:korrel8r-tls-flags

Conversation

@alanconway

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

No description provided.

@openshift-ci-robot

openshift-ci-robot commented Jun 11, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

@alanconway: This pull request references COO-1863 which is a valid jira issue.

Warning: The referenced jira issue has an invalid target version for the target branch this PR targets: expected the sub-task to target the "5.0.0" version, but no target version was set.

Details

In response to this:

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci Bot requested review from PeterYurkovich and zhuje June 11, 2026 17:34
@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Jun 11, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Review Change Stack

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

The pull request modifies the Korrel8r deployment manifest construction to make the container command arguments configurable. Previously, the container command was hardcoded as an inline argument slice. Now, the command is built dynamically by starting with the base korrel8r web arguments and conditionally appending TLS-related flags (--cipher-suites and --min-tls-version) when the corresponding configuration values (info.TLSCiphers and info.TLSMinVersion) are present.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 2 (Simple) | ⏱️ ~8 minutes

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 3 | ❌ 2

❌ Failed checks (1 warning, 1 inconclusive)

Check name Status Explanation Resolution
Docstring Coverage ⚠️ Warning Docstring coverage is 50.00% which is insufficient. The required threshold is 80.00%. Write docstrings for the functions missing them to satisfy the coverage threshold.
Description check ❓ Inconclusive No pull request description was provided by the author, so this check cannot evaluate whether the description relates to the changeset. Consider adding a pull request description that explains the purpose and context of the changes, even if brief.
✅ Passed checks (3 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Linked Issues check ✅ Passed Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Out of Scope Changes check ✅ Passed Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Title check ✅ Passed The title clearly and specifically describes the main change: korrel8r is now being passed the new TLS arguments (TLS ciphers and minimum TLS version flags).

✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings.

✨ Finishing Touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.

@alanconway alanconway force-pushed the korrel8r-tls-flags branch from 6fbbb33 to f2f744a Compare June 11, 2026 17:46
@etmurasaki

etmurasaki commented Jun 16, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

/label qe-approved
tested through OU-1411

@openshift-ci

openshift-ci Bot commented Jun 16, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

@etmurasaki: The label(s) qe-approved cannot be applied, because the repository doesn't have them.

Details

In response to this:

/label qe-approved
tested through OU-1411

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@simonpasquier simonpasquier changed the title fix: COO-1863: korrel8r is not being passed the new TLS arguments COO-1863: korrel8r is not being passed the new TLS arguments Jun 23, 2026
@simonpasquier

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

/approve
/lgtm

@openshift-ci

openshift-ci Bot commented Jun 23, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: alanconway, simonpasquier

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Details Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@simonpasquier

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

the commit message needs an update to comply with the linter checks.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants