Add Red Hat approved OpenStack operator icon

[posikoya]

Added the official, Red Hat-approved OpenStack operator icon to the ClusterServiceVersion manifest. The asset was sourced directly from an approved Red Hat site and encoded to Base64 to ensure the operator displays the logo correctly in the OperatorHub UI.

used the link from: openstack-k8s-operators/openstack-operator#914 (comment) to render the image

Jira: OSPRH-12506

[centosinfra-prod-github-app]

Build failed (check pipeline). Post recheck (without leading slash)
to rerun all jobs. Make sure the failure cause has been resolved before
you rerun jobs.

https://gateway-cloud-softwarefactory.apps.ocp.cloud.ci.centos.org/zuul/t/rdoproject.org/buildset/432c4b63a7c940069c57f02841286009

✔️ openstack-k8s-operators-content-provider SUCCESS in 3h 00m 30s
❌ test-operator-kuttl FAILURE in 49m 21s
✔️ podified-multinode-edpm-deployment-crc-test-operator SUCCESS in 2h 42m 33s

[centosinfra-prod-github-app]

Build failed (check pipeline). Post recheck (without leading slash)
to rerun all jobs. Make sure the failure cause has been resolved before
you rerun jobs.

https://gateway-cloud-softwarefactory.apps.ocp.cloud.ci.centos.org/zuul/t/rdoproject.org/buildset/5a919e5af7764ecfa122ca9fe283b6f7

✔️ openstack-k8s-operators-content-provider SUCCESS in 3h 04m 42s
❌ test-operator-kuttl FAILURE in 49m 13s
✔️ podified-multinode-edpm-deployment-crc-test-operator SUCCESS in 2h 36m 44s

[posikoya]

recheck

[centosinfra-prod-github-app]

Build failed (check pipeline). Post recheck (without leading slash)
to rerun all jobs. Make sure the failure cause has been resolved before
you rerun jobs.

https://gateway-cloud-softwarefactory.apps.ocp.cloud.ci.centos.org/zuul/t/rdoproject.org/buildset/014e0e1c2afd4680ae32e4e422322eb7

✔️ openstack-k8s-operators-content-provider SUCCESS in 2h 46m 26s
❌ test-operator-kuttl FAILURE in 50m 18s
❌ podified-multinode-edpm-deployment-crc-test-operator FAILURE in 2h 30m 35s

[centosinfra-prod-github-app]

Build failed (check pipeline). Post recheck (without leading slash)
to rerun all jobs. Make sure the failure cause has been resolved before
you rerun jobs.

https://gateway-cloud-softwarefactory.apps.ocp.cloud.ci.centos.org/zuul/t/rdoproject.org/buildset/f0f5c3b11e34494eb687b442cab423b3

✔️ openstack-k8s-operators-content-provider SUCCESS in 2h 48m 03s
❌ test-operator-kuttl FAILURE in 47m 16s
✔️ podified-multinode-edpm-deployment-crc-test-operator SUCCESS in 2h 32m 33s

[Valkyrie00]

LGTM but I'm waiting first for this review #454

[stuggi]

like discussed with @posikoya yesterday on slack and commented on https://redhat.atlassian.net/browse/OSPRH-12506?focusedCommentId=17278628 , isn’t this obsolet since the test-operator was integrated in the openstack-operator with Add test operator into the openstack-operator-index by lpiwowar · Pull Request #752 · openstack-k8s-operators/openstack-operator and there is no dedicated/standalone install method for the test-operator? from what I see. we do not ship a bundle downstream for test-operator - https://catalog.redhat.com/en/search?q=test-operator .

[posikoya]

recheck

[stuggi]

like discussed with @posikoya yesterday on slack and commented on https://redhat.atlassian.net/browse/OSPRH-12506?focusedCommentId=17278628 , isn’t this obsolet since the test-operator was integrated in the openstack-operator with Add test operator into the openstack-operator-index by lpiwowar · Pull Request #752 · openstack-k8s-operators/openstack-operator and there is no dedicated/standalone install method for the test-operator? from what I see. we do not ship a bundle downstream for test-operator - https://catalog.redhat.com/en/search?q=test-operator .

added the hold label as I think we should not need/land it, if I am wrong let me know.

[imatza-rh]

/lgtm
/approve

[openshift-ci]

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: imatza-rh, posikoya
Once this PR has been reviewed and has the lgtm label, please assign stuggi for approval. For more information see the Code Review Process.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Details

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

• OWNERS

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

[stuggi]

/lgtm /approve

@imatza-rh please check my previous comment

[imatza-rh]

/lgtm /approve

@imatza-rh please check my previous comment

Hey, I have no strong opinion from my side. The code change itself is lgtm (valid SVG, correct YAML placement), but I'll defer to you and @posikoya on whether it's needed given the downstream bundling situation.