Test GCP bastion host - #84071
Conversation
|
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: arkadeepsen The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. DetailsNeeds approval from an approver in each of these files:Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
|
No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉 ℹ️ Recent review info⚙️ Run configurationConfiguration used: Repository YAML (base), Central YAML (inherited) Review profile: CHILL Plan: Pro Plus Run ID: 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
Included review availability: Your plan provides up to 2 included reviews per hour; 1 remains after this review. WalkthroughThe change adds two blank lines after the retry loop and ChangesGCP bastion host provisioning
Estimated code review effort: 1 (Trivial) | ~2 minutes Merge Risk: ⚪ Minimal · up to This is a narrowly scoped change with no actionable merge-blocking risk remaining beyond normal checks and review. Suggested reviewers: 🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 14 | ❌ 1❌ Failed checks (1 warning)
✅ Passed checks (14 passed)
Full details: Docstring CoverageExplanation No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check. Docstring coverage is scoped to functions touched by this diff. Analyzed 0 functions across 1 files. Full details: Stable And Deterministic Test NamesExplanation PASS: The pull request changes only one shell script and adds blank lines after Full details: Test Structure And QualityExplanation PASS: The pull request changes only one shell script, Full details: Microshift Test CompatibilityExplanation PASS: The pull request changes only one shell script by adding a blank line. The commit adds no Ginkgo test declarations or markers, and the diff is empty when whitespace and blank lines are ignored. Therefore, the MicroShift test compatibility check is not applicable. Full details: Single Node Openshift (Sno) Test CompatibilityExplanation PASS: The pull request changes only Full details: Topology-Aware Scheduling CompatibilityExplanation PASS: The pull request changes only one shell script, adding blank lines after Full details: Ote Binary Stdout ContractExplanation PASS: The pull request changes only Full details: Ipv6 And Disconnected Network Test CompatibilityExplanation PASS: The pull request changes only one blank line in Full details: No-Weak-CryptoExplanation PASS. The pull request changes only whitespace: it adds one blank line after Full details: Container-PrivilegesExplanation PASS: The pull request changes only Full details: No-Sensitive-Data-In-LogsExplanation PASS: The pull request changes only one blank line in
✨ Finishing Touches🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
|
[REHEARSALNOTIFIER]
A total of 652 jobs have been affected by this change. The above listing is non-exhaustive and limited to 25 jobs. A full list of affected jobs can be found here Interacting with pj-rehearseComment: Once you are satisfied with the results of the rehearsals, comment: |
|
Checking if the changes in #83435 is causing the below tests to fail or not. /pj-rehearse pull-ci-openshift-csi-operator-main-e2e-gcp-csi-extended pull-ci-openshift-installer-main-gcp-private |
|
@arkadeepsen: now processing your pj-rehearse request. Please allow up to 10 minutes for jobs to trigger or cancel. |
|
@arkadeepsen: The following test failed, say
Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard. DetailsInstructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here. |
Summary by CodeRabbit