Skip to content

OSDOCS-16945# CQA work Stor1 - understanding ephemeral storage#106594

Open
lpettyjo wants to merge 1 commit into
openshift:mainfrom
lpettyjo:OSDOCS-16945-understanding-ephemeral-storage
Open

OSDOCS-16945# CQA work Stor1 - understanding ephemeral storage#106594
lpettyjo wants to merge 1 commit into
openshift:mainfrom
lpettyjo:OSDOCS-16945-understanding-ephemeral-storage

Conversation

@lpettyjo
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Version(s): 4.16+

Issue: https://issues.redhat.com/browse/OSDOCS-16945

Link to docs preview:

QE review:

  • QE has approved this change.

Additional information:

@openshift-ci openshift-ci Bot added the size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files. label Feb 13, 2026
@lpettyjo lpettyjo added this to the Continuous Release milestone Feb 13, 2026
@lpettyjo lpettyjo added the merge-review-needed Signifies that the merge review team needs to review this PR label Feb 13, 2026
Comment thread modules/storage-ephemeral-storage-manage.adoc Outdated
Comment thread modules/storage-ephemeral-storage-manage.adoc Outdated
Comment thread modules/storage-ephemeral-storage-manage.adoc Outdated
Comment thread modules/storage-ephemeral-storage-manage.adoc Outdated
@bscott-rh bscott-rh added merge-review-in-progress Signifies that the merge review team is reviewing this PR and removed merge-review-needed Signifies that the merge review team needs to review this PR labels Feb 16, 2026
Comment thread modules/storage-ephemeral-storage-manage.adoc
@bscott-rh bscott-rh removed the merge-review-in-progress Signifies that the merge review team is reviewing this PR label Feb 16, 2026
@lpettyjo lpettyjo force-pushed the OSDOCS-16945-understanding-ephemeral-storage branch from 87a808d to a418def Compare February 27, 2026 18:52
@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot added the needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. label Feb 27, 2026
@openshift-ci openshift-ci Bot added the size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files. label Feb 27, 2026
@lpettyjo lpettyjo force-pushed the OSDOCS-16945-understanding-ephemeral-storage branch from a418def to 7110f36 Compare February 27, 2026 19:04
@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot removed the needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. label Feb 27, 2026
@openshift openshift deleted a comment from openshift-ci Bot Feb 27, 2026

ifdef::microshift[]
[id=storage-ephemeral-storage-eviction_{context}]
.Ephemeral storage configuration effects pod eviction
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🤖 [error] AsciiDocDITA.BlockTitle: Block titles can only be assigned to examples, figures, and tables in DITA.

The suffixes for each byte quantity are case-sensitive. Be sure to use the correct case. Use the case-sensitive "M", such as used in "400M", to set the request at 400 megabytes. Use the case-sensitive "400Mi" to request 400 mebibytes. If you specify "400m" of ephemeral storage, the storage request is only 0.4 bytes.
====

.Ephemeral storage requests and limits example
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🤖 [error] AsciiDocDITA.BlockTitle: Block titles can only be assigned to examples, figures, and tables in DITA.

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Copy Markdown

openshift-ci Bot commented Feb 27, 2026

@lpettyjo: all tests passed!

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Details

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

@lpettyjo lpettyjo changed the title OSDOCS-16945# CQA work Storage - understanding ephemeral storage OSDOCS-16945# CQA work Stor1 - understanding ephemeral storage Mar 5, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants