Skip to content

Readding set up needed for ols ocp-mcp build.#1728

Open
sriroopar wants to merge 1 commit into
openshift:mainfrom
sriroopar:revert-ocp-mcp-changes
Open

Readding set up needed for ols ocp-mcp build.#1728
sriroopar wants to merge 1 commit into
openshift:mainfrom
sriroopar:revert-ocp-mcp-changes

Conversation

@sriroopar

@sriroopar sriroopar commented Jun 17, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Description

Summary

Details

The upstream openshift/openshift-mcp-server repo has no GitHub releases and publishes its image under openshift-mcp-tech-preview/openshift-mcp-server-rhel9, not
openshift-lightspeed/openshift-mcp-server-rhel9. The previous change to rely on Renovate polling registry.redhat.io/openshift-lightspeed/... for new digests was not picking up upstream releases correctly.

This reverts the following changes:

  • hack/snapshot_to_image_list.sh: Re-adds extraction of OPENSHIFT_MCP_SERVER_IMAGE and OPENSHIFT_MCP_SERVER_REVISION from the Konflux snapshot, and restores registry base overrides for preview and stable modes
  • renovate.json: Removes the customManagers block that tracked MCP server digest updates
  • related_images.json: Restores the revision field for the openshift-mcp-server entry

Type of change

  • Refactor
  • New feature
  • Bug fix
  • CVE fix
  • Optimization
  • Documentation Update
  • Configuration Update
  • Bump-up dependent library

Related Tickets & Documents

  • Related Issue #
  • Closes #

Checklist before requesting a review

  • I have performed a self-review of my code.
  • PR has passed all pre-merge test jobs.
  • If it is a core feature, I have added thorough tests.

Testing

  • Please provide detailed steps to perform tests related to this code change.
  • How were the fix/results from this change verified? Please provide relevant screenshots or results.

@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Jun 17, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Warning

Review limit reached

@sriroopar, we couldn't start this review because you've reached your PR review rate limit.

More reviews will be available in 38 minutes and 28 seconds. Learn how PR review limits work.

Your organization has used up its prepaid credits, and credit purchases are no longer available. Enable the review add-on in the billing tab to keep reviews running — you're only billed for reviews past your plan's rate limits ($0.25/file).

⌛ How to resolve this issue?

After more reviews become available, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

To avoid repeated limits, reduce automatic review volume by pausing incremental auto-reviews earlier, using label-based review opt-in, excluding WIP or generated PR titles, or requesting reviews manually when the PR is ready. If your team needs uninterrupted high-volume reviews, an organization admin can enable usage-based credits.

🚦 How do rate limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces per-developer PR review limits for each organization. Most developers receive the normal plan refill rate.

For paid Pro and Pro+ PR reviews, CodeRabbit uses adaptive limits for sustained high-volume activity. When a developer's recent PR review activity reaches the 95th percentile or higher among CodeRabbit users, the refill rate gradually slows as usage increases. The highest same-day bursts are limited more strictly.

Please see our Fair Usage Limits Policy for further information.

ℹ️ Review info
⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Path: .coderabbit.yaml

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Enterprise

Run ID: 0f183d1e-db72-48e6-b9e2-e7f9a1f33588

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 1be7a39 and dfeee32.

⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
  • related_images.json is excluded by !related_images.json
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • hack/snapshot_to_image_list.sh
  • renovate.json
✨ Finishing Touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci Bot requested review from blublinsky and xrajesh June 17, 2026 17:03
@openshift-ci

openshift-ci Bot commented Jun 17, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by:
Once this PR has been reviewed and has the lgtm label, please assign raptorsun for approval. For more information see the Code Review Process.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Details Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

CONSOLE_IMAGE=$(sed 's|quay\.io/redhat-user-workloads/crt-nshift-lightspeed-tenant/ols/lightspeed-console|'"${CONSOLE_IMAGE_BASE}"'|g' <<<${CONSOLE_IMAGE})
CONSOLE_IMAGE_PF5=$(sed 's|quay\.io/redhat-user-workloads/crt-nshift-lightspeed-tenant/lightspeed-console-pf5|'"${CONSOLE_IMAGE_BASE_PF5}"'|g' <<<${CONSOLE_IMAGE_PF5})
CONSOLE_IMAGE_419=$(sed 's|quay\.io/redhat-user-workloads/crt-nshift-lightspeed-tenant/lightspeed-console-4-19|'"${CONSOLE_IMAGE_BASE_419}"'|g' <<<${CONSOLE_IMAGE_419})
SERVICE_IMAGE=$(sed 's|quay\.io/redhat-user-workloads/crt-nshift-lightspeed-tenant/ols/lightspeed-service|'"${SERVICE_IMAGE_BASE}"'|g' <<<${SERVICE_IMAGE})

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This looks wrong. its like you merged, but did not resolve

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

what is wrong?

SERVICE_IMAGE=$(sed 's|quay\.io/redhat-user-workloads/crt-nshift-lightspeed-tenant/ols/lightspeed-service|'"${SERVICE_IMAGE_BASE}"'|g' <<<${SERVICE_IMAGE})
CONSOLE_IMAGE_PF5=$(sed 's|quay\.io/redhat-user-workloads/crt-nshift-lightspeed-tenant/lightspeed-console-pf5|'"${CONSOLE_IMAGE_BASE_PF5}"'|g' <<<${CONSOLE_IMAGE_PF5})
CONSOLE_IMAGE_419=$(sed 's|quay\.io/redhat-user-workloads/crt-nshift-lightspeed-tenant/lightspeed-console-4-19|'"${CONSOLE_IMAGE_BASE_419}"'|g' <<<${CONSOLE_IMAGE_419})
OPENSHIFT_MCP_SERVER_IMAGE=$(sed 's|quay\.io/redhat-user-workloads/crt-nshift-lightspeed-tenant/openshift-mcp-server|'"${OPENSHIFT_MCP_SERVER_IMAGE_BASE}"'|g' <<<${OPENSHIFT_MCP_SERVER_IMAGE})

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Same here

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

hey Boris, I compared the previous state to now and it looks the same, can you point me exactly to issue. Apologies..

@blublinsky blublinsky left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

please fix

@openshift-ci

openshift-ci Bot commented Jun 17, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

@sriroopar: all tests passed!

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Details

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants