Readding set up needed for ols ocp-mcp build.#1728
Conversation
|
Warning Review limit reached
More reviews will be available in 38 minutes and 28 seconds. Learn how PR review limits work. Your organization has used up its prepaid credits, and credit purchases are no longer available. Enable the review add-on in the billing tab to keep reviews running — you're only billed for reviews past your plan's rate limits ($0.25/file). ⌛ How to resolve this issue?After more reviews become available, a review can be triggered using the To avoid repeated limits, reduce automatic review volume by pausing incremental auto-reviews earlier, using label-based review opt-in, excluding WIP or generated PR titles, or requesting reviews manually when the PR is ready. If your team needs uninterrupted high-volume reviews, an organization admin can enable usage-based credits. 🚦 How do rate limits work?CodeRabbit enforces per-developer PR review limits for each organization. Most developers receive the normal plan refill rate. For paid Pro and Pro+ PR reviews, CodeRabbit uses adaptive limits for sustained high-volume activity. When a developer's recent PR review activity reaches the 95th percentile or higher among CodeRabbit users, the refill rate gradually slows as usage increases. The highest same-day bursts are limited more strictly. Please see our Fair Usage Limits Policy for further information. ℹ️ Review info⚙️ Run configurationConfiguration used: Path: .coderabbit.yaml Review profile: CHILL Plan: Enterprise Run ID: ⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
✨ Finishing Touches🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
|
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. DetailsNeeds approval from an approver in each of these files:Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
| CONSOLE_IMAGE=$(sed 's|quay\.io/redhat-user-workloads/crt-nshift-lightspeed-tenant/ols/lightspeed-console|'"${CONSOLE_IMAGE_BASE}"'|g' <<<${CONSOLE_IMAGE}) | ||
| CONSOLE_IMAGE_PF5=$(sed 's|quay\.io/redhat-user-workloads/crt-nshift-lightspeed-tenant/lightspeed-console-pf5|'"${CONSOLE_IMAGE_BASE_PF5}"'|g' <<<${CONSOLE_IMAGE_PF5}) | ||
| CONSOLE_IMAGE_419=$(sed 's|quay\.io/redhat-user-workloads/crt-nshift-lightspeed-tenant/lightspeed-console-4-19|'"${CONSOLE_IMAGE_BASE_419}"'|g' <<<${CONSOLE_IMAGE_419}) | ||
| SERVICE_IMAGE=$(sed 's|quay\.io/redhat-user-workloads/crt-nshift-lightspeed-tenant/ols/lightspeed-service|'"${SERVICE_IMAGE_BASE}"'|g' <<<${SERVICE_IMAGE}) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
This looks wrong. its like you merged, but did not resolve
| SERVICE_IMAGE=$(sed 's|quay\.io/redhat-user-workloads/crt-nshift-lightspeed-tenant/ols/lightspeed-service|'"${SERVICE_IMAGE_BASE}"'|g' <<<${SERVICE_IMAGE}) | ||
| CONSOLE_IMAGE_PF5=$(sed 's|quay\.io/redhat-user-workloads/crt-nshift-lightspeed-tenant/lightspeed-console-pf5|'"${CONSOLE_IMAGE_BASE_PF5}"'|g' <<<${CONSOLE_IMAGE_PF5}) | ||
| CONSOLE_IMAGE_419=$(sed 's|quay\.io/redhat-user-workloads/crt-nshift-lightspeed-tenant/lightspeed-console-4-19|'"${CONSOLE_IMAGE_BASE_419}"'|g' <<<${CONSOLE_IMAGE_419}) | ||
| OPENSHIFT_MCP_SERVER_IMAGE=$(sed 's|quay\.io/redhat-user-workloads/crt-nshift-lightspeed-tenant/openshift-mcp-server|'"${OPENSHIFT_MCP_SERVER_IMAGE_BASE}"'|g' <<<${OPENSHIFT_MCP_SERVER_IMAGE}) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
hey Boris, I compared the previous state to now and it looks the same, can you point me exactly to issue. Apologies..
|
@sriroopar: all tests passed! Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard. DetailsInstructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here. |
Description
Summary
Details
The upstream openshift/openshift-mcp-server repo has no GitHub releases and publishes its image under
openshift-mcp-tech-preview/openshift-mcp-server-rhel9, notopenshift-lightspeed/openshift-mcp-server-rhel9. The previous change to rely on Renovate pollingregistry.redhat.io/openshift-lightspeed/...for new digests was not picking up upstream releases correctly.This reverts the following changes:
hack/snapshot_to_image_list.sh: Re-adds extraction ofOPENSHIFT_MCP_SERVER_IMAGEandOPENSHIFT_MCP_SERVER_REVISIONfrom the Konflux snapshot, and restores registry base overrides forpreviewandstablemodesrenovate.json: Removes thecustomManagersblock that tracked MCP server digest updatesrelated_images.json: Restores therevisionfield for theopenshift-mcp-serverentryType of change
Related Tickets & Documents
Checklist before requesting a review
Testing