Skip to content

DNM: test ci#474

Closed
mfbonfigli wants to merge 2 commits into
openshift:mainfrom
mfbonfigli:dnm/ci-test
Closed

DNM: test ci#474
mfbonfigli wants to merge 2 commits into
openshift:mainfrom
mfbonfigli:dnm/ci-test

Conversation

@mfbonfigli

@mfbonfigli mfbonfigli commented Jun 17, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Do not merge: PR for CI testing purposes only

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Chores
    • Updated AWS cloud provider test dependency to the latest version.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci Bot added the do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. label Jun 17, 2026
@openshift-ci

openshift-ci Bot commented Jun 17, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Skipping CI for Draft Pull Request.
If you want CI signal for your change, please convert it to an actual PR.
You can still manually trigger a test run with /test all

@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Jun 17, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉

ℹ️ Recent review info
⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Repository: openshift/coderabbit/.coderabbit.yaml

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Enterprise

Run ID: 6e3a8a0b-7cac-4c98-b2b3-cfa139d02fce

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between d3f8b6a and 7bf54b4.

⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (4)
  • openshift-tests/ccm-aws-tests/go.sum is excluded by !**/*.sum
  • openshift-tests/ccm-aws-tests/vendor/k8s.io/cloud-provider-aws/tests/e2e/cloudconfig.go is excluded by !**/vendor/**
  • openshift-tests/ccm-aws-tests/vendor/k8s.io/cloud-provider-aws/tests/e2e/loadbalancer.go is excluded by !**/vendor/**
  • openshift-tests/ccm-aws-tests/vendor/modules.txt is excluded by !**/vendor/**
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • openshift-tests/ccm-aws-tests/go.mod

Walkthrough

The k8s.io/cloud-provider-aws/tests/e2e dependency in openshift-tests/ccm-aws-tests/go.mod is updated to a newer upstream commit. No other files, module declarations, or dependency entries are changed.

Changes

Dependency Version Bump

Layer / File(s) Summary
Update k8s.io/cloud-provider-aws/tests/e2e
openshift-tests/ccm-aws-tests/go.mod
Replaces the existing commit-pinned version of k8s.io/cloud-provider-aws/tests/e2e with a newer commit hash.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~2 minutes

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 11 | ❌ 4

❌ Failed checks (3 warnings, 1 inconclusive)

Check name Status Explanation Resolution
Microshift Test Compatibility ⚠️ Warning Tests use FeatureGate from config.openshift.io API (not available on MicroShift) without protection mechanisms like [apigroup:] tags or [Skipped:MicroShift] labels. Add [apigroup:config.openshift.io] tag to test name or guard with exutil.IsMicroShiftCluster() check to skip on MicroShift.
Single Node Openshift (Sno) Test Compatibility ⚠️ Warning New Ginkgo e2e tests added in openshift-tests/ccm-aws-tests/e2e/aws/loadbalancer.go lack SNO compatibility guards. Six test cases create LoadBalancer services without [Skipped:SingleReplicaTopology... Add [Skipped:SingleReplicaTopology] label to test names or guard with exutil.IsSingleNode() checks in test bodies to ensure SNO compatibility is explicitly managed.
Ipv6 And Disconnected Network Test Compatibility ⚠️ Warning Tests contain AWS API calls (ELBv2, EC2) that require connectivity to AWS regional endpoints, which will fail in disconnected IPv6-only environments. While no IPv4-specific code patterns found, tes... Add [Skipped:Disconnected] tag to test names or guard with environment check to skip when AWS API connectivity unavailable, since cloud provider tests inherently require external infrastructure access.
Title check ❓ Inconclusive The title 'DNM: test ci' is vague and generic, using non-descriptive abbreviations that don't convey meaningful information about the actual change (a Go module dependency update). Consider revising to be more descriptive, such as 'Update k8s.io/cloud-provider-aws test dependency' or similar, to clearly communicate the change even if this is a temporary CI test PR.
✅ Passed checks (11 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Description Check ✅ Passed Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Docstring Coverage ✅ Passed No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.
Linked Issues check ✅ Passed Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Out of Scope Changes check ✅ Passed Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Stable And Deterministic Test Names ✅ Passed All Ginkgo test names in this PR are stable and deterministic. They contain only static descriptive strings with no dynamic information like pod names, timestamps, UUIDs, node names, namespace suff...
Test Structure And Quality ✅ Passed PR contains Ginkgo tests that adhere to all quality criteria: single responsibility (each It block tests one behavior), proper BeforeEach setup, timeouts on cluster operations (wait.PollUntilContex...
Topology-Aware Scheduling Compatibility ✅ Passed The PR only adds a go.mod file (test infrastructure dependency declaration). It contains no deployment manifests, operator code, or controllers, and introduces no scheduling constraints or topology...
Ote Binary Stdout Contract ✅ Passed No process-level stdout violations detected. Code uses logrus (defaults to stderr) and Ginkgo framework which properly manages stdout. No fmt.Print/os.Stdout writes found in main(), init(), or setu...
No-Weak-Crypto ✅ Passed PR only updates Go dependencies in go.mod/go.sum with no new source code. Comprehensive scan found no weak crypto patterns (MD5, SHA1, DES, RC4, 3DES, Blowfish, ECB, custom implementations, or non-...
Container-Privileges ✅ Passed PR contains hostNetwork: true in deployment manifest, but it has explicit justification via openshift.io/required-scc: hostaccess annotation. No privileged: true, hostPID, hostIPC, SYS_ADMIN, root...
No-Sensitive-Data-In-Logs ✅ Passed PR only updates go.mod dependency version; no logging code is modified or added, and no sensitive data is exposed in the changes.

✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings.

✨ Finishing Touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

@openshift-ci

openshift-ci Bot commented Jun 17, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by:
Once this PR has been reviewed and has the lgtm label, please assign damdo for approval. For more information see the Code Review Process.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Details Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@mfbonfigli

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

/test e2e-aws-ovn

@openshift-ci

openshift-ci Bot commented Jun 18, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@mfbonfigli: The following test failed, say /retest to rerun all failed tests or /retest-required to rerun all mandatory failed tests:

Test name Commit Details Required Rerun command
ci/prow/e2e-aws-ovn 7bf54b4 link true /test e2e-aws-ovn

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Details

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

@mfbonfigli mfbonfigli closed this Jun 19, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant