Remove/Update stale provider "glhf"

[masterpatrickpl-coder]

typo?

[Sweaterdog]

Right...

[riqvip]

I think it's better to just remove GLHF as a whole. Seems like the website is never up.

[Sweaterdog]

Makes sense

[uukelele]

I think it's better to just remove GLHF as a whole. Seems like the website is never up.

It's because they rebranded to synthetic.new

Initially, they did have the glhf.chat domain redirecting to synthetic.new, but now that's gone too.

It may be worthy to note that OpenClaw also supports Synthetic as a provider.

Also, any glhf.chat accounts that received the $10.00 promotional credit (it was maybe a year ago) still have the credit when logging in to synthetic.new

Perhaps we could turn glhf.js into synthetic.js, or just drop support for it entirely.

[riqvip]

I think it's better to just remove GLHF as a whole. Seems like the website is never up.

It's because they rebranded to synthetic.new

Initially, they did have the glhf.chat domain redirecting to synthetic.new, but now that's gone too.

It may be worthy to note that OpenClaw also supports Synthetic as a provider.

Also, any glhf.chat accounts that received the $10.00 promotional credit (it was maybe a year ago) still have the credit when logging in to synthetic.new

Perhaps we could turn glhf.js into synthetic.js, or just drop support for it entirely.

Up to you. Either approve and merge the current changes or add support for synthetic. We could also do a separate PR for that.

[masterpatrickpl-coder]

I think it's better to just remove GLHF as a whole. Seems like the website is never up.

It's because they rebranded to synthetic.new
Initially, they did have the glhf.chat domain redirecting to synthetic.new, but now that's gone too.
It may be worthy to note that OpenClaw also supports Synthetic as a provider.

Also, any glhf.chat accounts that received the $10.00 promotional credit (it was maybe a year ago) still have the credit when logging in to synthetic.new
Perhaps we could turn glhf.js into synthetic.js, or just drop support for it entirely.

Up to you. Either approve and merge the current changes or add support for synthetic. We could also do a separate PR for that.

I only made this pull request because I noticed that the letter/s were mixed up, but if you guys wish to take over this pull request to completely remove this provider, go ahead.

[masterpatrickpl-coder]

Would it also be a good idea to check if there are any other stale/non existent model providers?