Skip to content

Move GPOs out of category "Windows Components"#337

Open
htcfreek wants to merge 2 commits into
microsoft:mainfrom
htcfreek:htcfreek-patch-1
Open

Move GPOs out of category "Windows Components"#337
htcfreek wants to merge 2 commits into
microsoft:mainfrom
htcfreek:htcfreek-patch-1

Conversation

@htcfreek

@htcfreek htcfreek commented Jun 22, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Summary of the Pull Request

Intelligent Terminal isn't a Windows built-in component. So the correct place for the policy folder to be is outside of "Windows Components".

This PR

  • moves the IntelligentTerminal category outside of "Windows Components".
  • renames the category from "Intelligent Terminal" to "Microsoft Intelligent Terminal"

References and Relevant Issues

Detailed Description of the Pull Request / Additional comments

Validation Steps Performed

PR Checklist

  • Closes #xxx
  • Tests added/passed
  • Documentation updated
    • If checked, please file a pull request on our docs repo and link it here: #xxx
  • Schema updated (if necessary)

Copilot AI review requested due to automatic review settings June 22, 2026 14:01

Copilot AI left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull request overview

This PR adjusts the Group Policy (ADMX/ADML) placement and labeling for Intelligent Terminal so it no longer appears under the built-in Windows Components node and instead shows as its own top-level Administrative Templates category with updated branding.

Changes:

  • Removes the windows:WindowsComponents parent category reference so the Intelligent Terminal category becomes a root policy node.
  • Updates the displayed category name from “Intelligent Terminal” to “Microsoft Intelligent Terminal” via the localized string resource.

Reviewed changes

Copilot reviewed 2 out of 2 changed files in this pull request and generated no comments.

File Description
policies/IntelligentTerminal.admx Drops the windows:WindowsComponents parentCategory so the policy category is no longer nested under Windows Components.
policies/en-US/IntelligentTerminal.adml Updates the IntelligentTerminal string resource to display “Microsoft Intelligent Terminal” in the policy UI.

@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown

@check-spelling-bot Report

⚠️ Dictionary not found

Problems were encountered retrieving check dictionaries (cspell:monkeyc/src/monkeyc_keywords.txt cspell:svelte/dict/svelte.txt cspell:fullstack/dict/fullstack.txt cspell:clojure/src/clojure.txt cspell:software-terms/dict/webServices.txt cspell:cpp/src/compiler-clang-attributes.txt cspell:redis/dict/redis.txt cspell:elixir/dict/elixir.txt cspell:haskell/dict/haskell.txt cspell:cpp/src/ecosystem.txt cspell:dart/src/dart.txt cspell:java/src/java.txt cspell:php/dict/php.txt cspell:rust/dict/rust.txt cspell:latex/dict/latex.txt cspell:python/src/additional_words.txt cspell:cpp/src/template-strings.txt cspell:node/dict/node.txt cspell:cpp/src/stdlib-cmath.txt cspell:public-licenses/src/additional-licenses.txt cspell:cpp/src/stdlib-c.txt cspell:python/src/python/python.txt cspell:docker/src/docker-words.txt cspell:public-licenses/src/generated/public-licenses.txt cspell:typescript/dict/typescript.txt cspell:shell/dict/shell-all-words.txt cspell:python/src/common/extra.txt cspell:css/dict/css.txt cspell:cpp/src/compiler-gcc.txt cspell:dotnet/dict/dotnet.txt cspell:cpp/src/lang-jargon.txt cspell:npm/dict/npm.txt cspell:python/src/python/python-lib.txt cspell:django/dict/django.txt cspell:cpp/src/people.txt cspell:cpp/src/compiler-msvc.txt cspell:r/src/r.txt cspell:k8s/dict/k8s.txt cspell:sql/src/tsql.txt cspell:cpp/src/stdlib-cerrno.txt cspell:gaming-terms/dict/gaming-terms.txt cspell:cpp/src/stdlib-cpp.txt cspell:lua/dict/lua.txt cspell:powershell/dict/powershell.txt cspell:scala/dict/scala.txt cspell:sql/src/sql.txt cspell:cpp/src/lang-keywords.txt cspell:golang/dict/go.txt cspell:java/src/java-terms.txt cspell:swift/src/swift.txt cspell:ruby/dict/ruby.txt cspell:ada/dict/ada.txt cspell:html/dict/html.txt cspell:software-terms/dict/softwareTerms.txt).

⚠️ For more information, see check-dictionary-not-found.

🔴 Please review

See the 📂 files view, the 📜action log, 👼 SARIF report, or 📝 job summary for details.

Unrecognized words (1)

cands

These words are not needed and should be removed allsigned Backgrounder CANTCALLOUT Ccc cplusplus ctl Debian dotnet drv endptr EOFs evt Fullwidth gitlab hdr idl IME inbox ININPUTSYNCCALL intelligentterminal Ioctl KVM lbl lld lsb NODEFAULT NONINFRINGEMENT notif oss outdir Podcast pri prioritization rcv segfault SND sourced SWP Tbl testname transitioning unk unparseable unregisters Virt VMs webpage websites WINVER xsi

To accept these unrecognized words as correct and remove the previously acknowledged and now absent words, you could run the following commands

... in a clone of the git@github.com:htcfreek/intelligent-terminal.git repository
on the htcfreek-patch-1 branch (ℹ️ how do I use this?):

curl -s -S -L 'https://raw.githubusercontent.com/check-spelling/check-spelling/cfb6f7e75bbfc89c71eaa30366d0c166f1bd9c8c/apply.pl' |
perl - 'https://github.com/microsoft/intelligent-terminal/actions/runs/27958373271/attempts/1' &&
git commit -m 'Update check-spelling metadata'
Available 📚 dictionaries could cover words (expected and unrecognized) not in the 📘 dictionary

This includes both expected items (2064) from .github/actions/spelling/expect/alphabet.txt .github/actions/spelling/expect/expect.txt .github/actions/spelling/expect/web.txt and unrecognized words (1)

Dictionary Entries Covers Uniquely
cspell:csharp/csharp.txt 32 2 2
cspell:aws/aws.txt 232 2 2
cspell:fonts/fonts.txt 536 1 1

Consider adding to the extra_dictionaries array (in the .github/actions/spelling/config.json file):

    "cspell:csharp/csharp.txt",
    "cspell:aws/aws.txt",
    "cspell:fonts/fonts.txt",

To stop checking additional dictionaries, put (in the .github/actions/spelling/config.json file):

"check_extra_dictionaries": []
Warnings ⚠️ (1)

See the 📂 files view, the 📜action log, 👼 SARIF report, or 📝 job summary for details.

⚠️ Warnings Count
⚠️ check-dictionary-not-found 54

See ⚠️ Event descriptions for more information.

✏️ Contributor please read this

By default the command suggestion will generate a file named based on your commit. That's generally ok as long as you add the file to your commit. Someone can reorganize it later.

If the listed items are:

  • ... misspelled, then please correct them instead of using the command.
  • ... names, please add them to .github/actions/spelling/allow/names.txt.
  • ... APIs, you can add them to a file in .github/actions/spelling/allow/.
  • ... just things you're using, please add them to an appropriate file in .github/actions/spelling/expect/.
  • ... tokens you only need in one place and shouldn't generally be used, you can add an item in an appropriate file in .github/actions/spelling/patterns/.

See the README.md in each directory for more information.

🔬 You can test your commits without appending to a PR by creating a new branch with that extra change and pushing it to your fork. The check-spelling action will run in response to your push -- it doesn't require an open pull request. By using such a branch, you can limit the number of typos your peers see you make. 😉

If the flagged items are 🤯 false positives

If items relate to a ...

  • binary file (or some other file you wouldn't want to check at all).

    Please add a file path to the excludes.txt file matching the containing file.

    File paths are Perl 5 Regular Expressions - you can test yours before committing to verify it will match your files.

    ^ refers to the file's path from the root of the repository, so ^README\.md$ would exclude README.md (on whichever branch you're using).

  • well-formed pattern.

    If you can write a pattern that would match it,
    try adding it to the patterns.txt file.

    Patterns are Perl 5 Regular Expressions - you can test yours before committing to verify it will match your lines.

    Note that patterns can't match multiline strings.

@htcfreek

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

@DDKinger , @DHowett
Any reason for not merging this?

@DHowett

DHowett commented Jul 14, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

I am not part of this project.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants