Conversation
Signed-off-by: Thomas Clarke <tonux@riseup.net>
credit: Thierry Laurion (tlaurion) linuxboot@842eda2#diff-18936189b28399cf48703d0c1ec1df33e57c559de2a12f4438be00e6813bdb68 Signed-off-by: Thomas Clarke <tonux@riseup.net>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Clarke <tonux@riseup.net>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Clarke <tonux@riseup.net>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Clarke <tonux@riseup.net>
d7677f3 to
6642b2d
Compare
|
@Tonux599 on tpm support, boards need to be either TPM1 or tpm2 since toolstack is different. You can look at qemu boards for examples |
ELI5? State Of the Art? |
|
@Tonux599 ref of vikings HCL over 4.11 and changes from dasharo and or regressions/improvements |
Define SoA? But I'm not too sure to be honest, I've heard that Dasharo is slower at runtime. Once my testing suit is setup I'll run some benchmarks and try and reproduce. |
SoA: State Of the Art. EDIT: #1760 merged since no regression observed on a previously working system and should improve situation where previously unstable. |
|
@Tonux599 ping |
|
Sorry but I have no motivation to continue this because of QubesOS/qubes-issues#9150 |
Expect 6ish months to complete due to other commitments.
Primary work/testing will be on the
kgpe-d16_workstationvariant but other can be re-enabled if others want to test them.Todo List:
Either support TPM1.2 and TPM2.0 on the same board config. Else,setup multiple variants for TPM1.2 and TPM2.0.