Skip to content

Cleanup patches#524

Open
blktests-ci[bot] wants to merge 2 commits intolinus-master_basefrom
series/1048407=>linus-master
Open

Cleanup patches#524
blktests-ci[bot] wants to merge 2 commits intolinus-master_basefrom
series/1048407=>linus-master

Conversation

@blktests-ci
Copy link

@blktests-ci blktests-ci bot commented Jan 29, 2026

Pull request for series with
subject: Cleanup patches
version: 1
url: https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-block/list/?series=1048407

@blktests-ci
Copy link
Author

blktests-ci bot commented Jan 29, 2026

Upstream branch: 8dfce89
series: https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-block/list/?series=1048407
version: 1

@blktests-ci
Copy link
Author

blktests-ci bot commented Jan 29, 2026

Upstream branch: 8dfce89
series: https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-block/list/?series=1048407
version: 1

@blktests-ci blktests-ci bot force-pushed the series/1048407=>linus-master branch from da2372f to d1ab428 Compare January 29, 2026 09:33
@blktests-ci
Copy link
Author

blktests-ci bot commented Jan 29, 2026

Upstream branch: 8dfce89
series: https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-block/list/?series=1048407
version: 1

@blktests-ci blktests-ci bot force-pushed the series/1048407=>linus-master branch from d1ab428 to 350a5c3 Compare January 29, 2026 09:51
@blktests-ci
Copy link
Author

blktests-ci bot commented Jan 29, 2026

Upstream branch: 8dfce89
series: https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-block/list/?series=1048407
version: 1

@blktests-ci blktests-ci bot force-pushed the series/1048407=>linus-master branch from 350a5c3 to 4029c08 Compare January 29, 2026 12:00
@blktests-ci
Copy link
Author

blktests-ci bot commented Jan 30, 2026

Upstream branch: 8dfce89
series: https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-block/list/?series=1048407
version: 1

@blktests-ci blktests-ci bot force-pushed the series/1048407=>linus-master branch from 4029c08 to 7b3a110 Compare January 30, 2026 05:41
@blktests-ci
Copy link
Author

blktests-ci bot commented Jan 30, 2026

Upstream branch: 8dfce89
series: https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-block/list/?series=1048407
version: 1

@blktests-ci blktests-ci bot force-pushed the series/1048407=>linus-master branch from 7b3a110 to fc952de Compare January 30, 2026 05:50
@blktests-ci blktests-ci bot force-pushed the linus-master_base branch from 483aa43 to 9d3c6de Compare February 3, 2026 19:06
@blktests-ci
Copy link
Author

blktests-ci bot commented Feb 3, 2026

Upstream branch: de0674d
series: https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-block/list/?series=1048407
version: 1

@blktests-ci blktests-ci bot force-pushed the series/1048407=>linus-master branch from fc952de to fb2affb Compare February 3, 2026 19:10
@blktests-ci blktests-ci bot force-pushed the linus-master_base branch from 9d3c6de to 7c2ae0a Compare February 5, 2026 03:28
Unwrap the definition of BLK_FEAT_ATOMIC_WRITES and
renumber this feature to be sequential with BLK_FEAT_SKIP_TAGSET_QUIESCE.

Signed-off-by: Damien Le Moal <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Nitesh Shetty <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: John Garry <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <[email protected]>
To check if a request queue is for a rotational device, a double
negation is needed with the pattern "!blk_queue_nonrot(q)". Simplify
this with the introduction of the helper blk_queue_rot() which tests
if a requests queue limit has the BLK_FEAT_ROTATIONAL feature set.
All call sites of blk_queue_nonrot() are modified to use blk_queue_rot()
and blk_queue_nonrot() definition removed.

No functional changes.

Signed-off-by: Damien Le Moal <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Nitesh Shetty <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <[email protected]>
@blktests-ci
Copy link
Author

blktests-ci bot commented Feb 5, 2026

Upstream branch: f14faaf
series: https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-block/list/?series=1048407
version: 1

@blktests-ci blktests-ci bot force-pushed the series/1048407=>linus-master branch from fb2affb to 7e9b9e7 Compare February 5, 2026 03:33
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant