Conversation
|
Unsubscribing... @-mention or request review once it's ready for a look or needs attention. |
…ack the items in the later axes as opposed to prepending the new axes.
…the new axes at the end.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Have you looked at this docstring rendered?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
This is here so that I can actually execute the code made in the examples folder. Perhaps it would be better to just make a subclass in the examples code and then use that instead.
|
Unsubscribing... @-mention or request review once it's ready for a look or needs attention. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Just build the right-size Placeholder to start with.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
We only build the placeholder once. I am allowing the multiple-instance argument to be passed to the function _to_input_for_compiled(arg, actx) whose functionality depends on the input ArrayContext on account of a subsequent call to actx.transform_dag(arg). We are cutting to a placeholder afterwards so that the pytato.transfrom.materialize_with_mpms materialization strategy is still used. Other ArrayContexts may have other strategies implemented before the compilation step.
…equence result in the same numerical values as the one multiple instance execution.
…th the parameter study and then you get an Array or Container of the same type as if you had done the single instance program.
2 participants
This is an enhancement pull request.
Its purpose is to allow a user to specify a program, P($var1$ , $var2$ , $\dots$ ) $\rightarrow out$ and transform it into a new program $P'(var1_{s1}, var2_{s2}, \dots)$ $\rightarrow out_{s1,s2}$ . $out_{s1,s2, \dots}$ will contain the answers to running $P$ on each input variable grouping in the input shape.
Needs:
requirements.txt