Skip to content

test: validate exhort-integration-tests TC-4813#567

Open
a-oren wants to merge 1 commit into
guacsec:mainfrom
a-oren:TC-4813
Open

test: validate exhort-integration-tests TC-4813#567
a-oren wants to merge 1 commit into
guacsec:mainfrom
a-oren:TC-4813

Conversation

@a-oren

@a-oren a-oren commented Jun 24, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Summary

  • Points integration workflow to a-oren/exhort-integration-tests@TC-4813 to validate syft image analysis scenarios before merging

Related

Test plan

  • Integration tests pass with the updated workflow reference

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

Summary by Sourcery

CI:

  • Point integration workflow to use the exhort-integration-tests reusable workflow from the TC-4813 branch in the a-oren fork.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
@sourcery-ai

sourcery-ai Bot commented Jun 24, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Reviewer's guide (collapsed on small PRs)

Reviewer's Guide

Update integration GitHub Actions workflow to run the integration tests from a feature branch in a forked exhort-integration-tests repository, in order to validate syft image analysis scenarios before merging.

File-Level Changes

Change Details Files
Point integration workflow to use a fork/feature-branch version of exhort-integration-tests instead of main in the upstream repo.
  • Change the reusable workflow reference in the integration job to use the a-oren/exhort-integration-tests repository.
  • Pin the reusable workflow to the TC-4813 branch instead of main.
  • Keep all workflow inputs and job conditions unchanged to isolate the impact to the workflow source reference.
.github/workflows/integration.yml

Tips and commands

Interacting with Sourcery

  • Trigger a new review: Comment @sourcery-ai review on the pull request.
  • Continue discussions: Reply directly to Sourcery's review comments.
  • Generate a GitHub issue from a review comment: Ask Sourcery to create an
    issue from a review comment by replying to it. You can also reply to a
    review comment with @sourcery-ai issue to create an issue from it.
  • Generate a pull request title: Write @sourcery-ai anywhere in the pull
    request title to generate a title at any time. You can also comment
    @sourcery-ai title on the pull request to (re-)generate the title at any time.
  • Generate a pull request summary: Write @sourcery-ai summary anywhere in
    the pull request body to generate a PR summary at any time exactly where you
    want it. You can also comment @sourcery-ai summary on the pull request to
    (re-)generate the summary at any time.
  • Generate reviewer's guide: Comment @sourcery-ai guide on the pull
    request to (re-)generate the reviewer's guide at any time.
  • Resolve all Sourcery comments: Comment @sourcery-ai resolve on the
    pull request to resolve all Sourcery comments. Useful if you've already
    addressed all the comments and don't want to see them anymore.
  • Dismiss all Sourcery reviews: Comment @sourcery-ai dismiss on the pull
    request to dismiss all existing Sourcery reviews. Especially useful if you
    want to start fresh with a new review - don't forget to comment
    @sourcery-ai review to trigger a new review!

Customizing Your Experience

Access your dashboard to:

  • Enable or disable review features such as the Sourcery-generated pull request
    summary, the reviewer's guide, and others.
  • Change the review language.
  • Add, remove or edit custom review instructions.
  • Adjust other review settings.

Getting Help

@sourcery-ai sourcery-ai Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hey - I've left some high level feedback:

  • Referencing a personal fork and branch (a-oren/exhort-integration-tests@TC-4813) in a shared workflow can be fragile; consider pinning to a specific commit SHA or a tag and adding a follow-up to revert back to trustification/...@main once validation is complete.
  • If this temporary workflow change is only for validation, you may want to guard it with a condition or a clear TODO comment in the YAML to avoid accidentally running against the forked workflow long term.
Prompt for AI Agents
Please address the comments from this code review:

## Overall Comments
- Referencing a personal fork and branch (`a-oren/exhort-integration-tests@TC-4813`) in a shared workflow can be fragile; consider pinning to a specific commit SHA or a tag and adding a follow-up to revert back to `trustification/...@main` once validation is complete.
- If this temporary workflow change is only for validation, you may want to guard it with a condition or a clear TODO comment in the YAML to avoid accidentally running against the forked workflow long term.

Sourcery is free for open source - if you like our reviews please consider sharing them ✨
Help me be more useful! Please click 👍 or 👎 on each comment and I'll use the feedback to improve your reviews.

@codecov-commenter

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 90.75%. Comparing base (ab5949f) to head (fc739a8).

Additional details and impacted files

Impacted file tree graph

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main     #567   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   90.75%   90.75%           
=======================================
  Files          36       36           
  Lines        7766     7766           
  Branches     1353     1353           
=======================================
  Hits         7048     7048           
  Misses        718      718           
Flag Coverage Δ
unit-tests 90.75% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants