chore: fix .repo-metadata.json oddities#15611
Conversation
The same changes are applied in packages and in .librarian/generator-input so that there won't be any extra diffs when these APIs are next generated.
Summary of ChangesHello @jskeet, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed! This pull request addresses minor inconsistencies in Highlights
Changelog
Using Gemini Code AssistThe full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips. Invoking Gemini You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either
Customization To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a Limitations & Feedback Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here. You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension. Footnotes
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Code Review
The pull request addresses minor inconsistencies in .repo-metadata.json files by correcting issue tracker URLs and adding https:// prefixes to product documentation URLs. These changes ensure the metadata is accurate and consistently formatted, which is a good cleanup.
The same changes are applied in packages and in .librarian/generator-input so that there won't be any extra diffs when these APIs are next generated.