Update documentation link for GitHub-hosted runners

[mcummings128]

Updated link to documentation for GitHub-hosted runners. The current link points to https://docs.github.com/en/enterprise-server@3.20/actions/reference/runners/github-hosted-runners#single-cpu-runners, when it should point to https://docs.github.com/en/actions/reference/runners/github-hosted-runners

Why:

Closes:

What's being changed (if available, include any code snippets, screenshots, or gifs):

Check off the following:

• A subject matter expert (SME) has reviewed the technical accuracy of the content in this PR. In most cases, the author can be the SME. Open source contributions may require an SME review from GitHub staff.
• The changes in this PR meet the docs fundamentals that are required for all content.
• All CI checks are passing and the changes look good in the review environment.

[docs-bot]

This pull request may have been opened accidentally. I'm going to close it now, but feel free to check out our contribution guidelines, or raise an issue.

[github-actions]

How to review these changes 👓

Thank you for your contribution. To review these changes, choose one of the following options:

• Spin up a codespace
• Set up a local development environment

A Hubber will need to deploy your changes internally to review.

Table of review links

Note: Please update the URL for your staging server or codespace.

The table shows the files in the content directory that were changed in this pull request. This helps you review your changes on a staging server. Changes to the data directory are not included in this table.

Source	Review	Production	What Changed
actions/concepts/runners/github-hosted-runners.md	fpt ghec ghes@ 3.22 3.21 3.20 3.19 3.18 3.17	fpt ghec ghes@ 3.22 3.21 3.20 3.19 3.18 3.17

Key: fpt: Free, Pro, Team; ghec: GitHub Enterprise Cloud; ghes: GitHub Enterprise Server

🤖 This comment is automatically generated.

[subatoi]

@mcummings128 Hello, I'll tighten up the anti-spam workflows but in this instance, I'm not sure why this was raised like this—if you've spotted something like this you'd suggest needs changing, I'd recommend opening an issue. Thank you