feat: add ThoughtProof reasoning evaluator example for ACP jobs#194
Open
ThoughtProof wants to merge 2 commits intogame-by-virtuals:mainfrom
Open
feat: add ThoughtProof reasoning evaluator example for ACP jobs#194ThoughtProof wants to merge 2 commits intogame-by-virtuals:mainfrom
ThoughtProof wants to merge 2 commits intogame-by-virtuals:mainfrom
Conversation
Adds an example showing how to use ThoughtProof as a reasoning-based evaluator for ACP jobs via the on_evaluate callback. Complements maiat_evaluator_example.py: - Maiat checks trust (is this provider reliable historically?) - ThoughtProof checks reasoning (is this specific deliverable well-justified?) Payment: x402, approx $0.02 USDC on Base per evaluation.
Author
|
Updated this branch to align with pot-sdk v2.0 (now live at api.thoughtproof.ai). Changes: • Verdict enum: ALLOW / BLOCK / UNCERTAIN (was ALLOW / HOLD / DISSENT) HOLD and DISSENT are now internal calibration states only — they no longer appear in public API responses. ─── Example — ThoughtProof as ACP job evaluator: acp_client = VirtualsACP( Deliverable: "ETH trade thesis with sentiment only, no data"ThoughtProof → BLOCK — job.evaluate(False), payment withheldDeliverable: "Structured analysis with price levels, stop-loss, and rationale"ThoughtProof → ALLOW (confidence: 0.84) — job.evaluate(True), payment releasedDeliverable: "Ambiguous output — incomplete reasoning"ThoughtProof → UNCERTAIN — accepts with review flagThe evaluator hook sits between job completion and payment release. ThoughtProof verifies the reasoning quality of the deliverable before job.evaluate(True) is called. |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary
Adds an example showing how to use ThoughtProof as a reasoning-based evaluator for ACP jobs via the
on_evaluatecallback.What it does
Checks whether a job deliverable is well-reasoned before accepting payment — adversarial multi-model critique returns ALLOW or HOLD.
Why
Complements #193 (Maiat trust evaluator):
Both evaluators together: reliable provider + sound reasoning = full coverage.
Usage