Skip to content

Update dependency score_process to v2.0.3 - #64

Open
eclipse-score-bot wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
renovate/score_process-2.x
Open

Update dependency score_process to v2.0.3#64
eclipse-score-bot wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
renovate/score_process-2.x

Conversation

@eclipse-score-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

This PR contains the following updates:

Package Type Update Change
score_process bazel_dep patch 2.0.22.0.3

Release Notes

eclipse-score/process_description (score_process)

v2.0.3

What's Changed

Other Changes

Full Changelog: eclipse-score/process_description@v2.0.2...v2.0.3


  • If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

This PR was generated by #infrastructure automation. Contact us if you have any questions or feedback.

@eclipse-score-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

⚠️ Artifact update problem

Renovate failed to update an artifact related to this branch. You probably do not want to merge this PR as-is.

♻ Renovate will retry this branch, including artifacts, only when one of the following happens:

  • any of the package files in this branch needs updating, or
  • the branch becomes conflicted, or
  • you click the rebase/retry checkbox if found above, or
  • you rename this PR's title to start with "rebase!" to trigger it manually

The artifact failure details are included below:

File name: MODULE.bazel.lock
Command failed: bazel mod deps --lockfile_mode=update
2026/08/05 14:51:25 Downloading https://releases.bazel.build/8.3.0/release/bazel-8.3.0-linux-x86_64...
2026/08/05 14:51:25 Signed by Bazel Developer (Bazel APT repository key) <bazel-dev@googlegroups.com>
Extracting Bazel installation...
Starting local Bazel server (8.3.0) and connecting to it...
 no actions running
 no actions running
ERROR: score_process@2.0.3 depends on score_docs_as_code@6.0.0 with compatibility level 6, but <root> depends on score_docs_as_code@4.6.1 with compatibility level 4 which is different

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant