Conversation
AliceR
reviewed
Apr 27, 2021
| @@ -1 +1 @@ | |||
| 14 | |||
| 14.15.1 | |||
Member
There was a problem hiding this comment.
That seems very specific. Is there a reason for it?
Member
|
Nice addition!! 🚀 Things I noticed, which apply to all the cookiecutter branches:
|
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
I'm not sure if this should be a standalone option or part of the parcel branch. I think it depends on the extent to which we want to maintain these (parcel and browserify) branches as 'minimal config templates'.
I have had a few requests in the past for a ui-lib app template and I thought this would be an ideal way to offer a no-fuss application spin-up for folks on other teams when they need to create very simple interfaces