Skip to content

Add placeholder diagnostics report for v0.2 vs USEEIO and CEDA-US#14

Open
MoLi7 wants to merge 3 commits into
publishedfrom
internal-review-diagnostics-report
Open

Add placeholder diagnostics report for v0.2 vs USEEIO and CEDA-US#14
MoLi7 wants to merge 3 commits into
publishedfrom
internal-review-diagnostics-report

Conversation

@MoLi7

@MoLi7 MoLi7 commented Apr 28, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Summary

  • Adds a placeholder diagnostics report (diagnostics_report/bedrock_diagnostics.md) comparing v0.2 against USEEIO and CEDA-US benchmarks.
  • Headline numbers are TBD; figure references are stubbed in for the eventual outputs.

Supersedes #12 / #13 — branch renamed to internal-review-diagnostics-report (dashes) for consistency; file renamed to bedrock_diagnostics.md to keep the link stable across versions.

Test plan

  • Confirm placeholder structure matches intended sections
  • Fill in TBD headline numbers and validate figure paths once available

MoLi7 and others added 3 commits April 25, 2026 11:51
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Keep link stable across versions per review feedback; tag specific
versions for reference.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
@MoLi7 MoLi7 requested a review from WesIngwersen April 28, 2026 00:56
@MoLi7

MoLi7 commented Apr 28, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

@WesIngwersen fyi I closed the previous two PRs due to branch name issues. Here I've addressed your comments about renaming the file and branch in this PR.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant