GH-49930: [CI][C++] Revert PR 49931 (Pin MinGW MSYS2 packages) but keep bumped minIO version#49945
Draft
tadeja wants to merge 7 commits intoapache:mainfrom
Draft
GH-49930: [CI][C++] Revert PR 49931 (Pin MinGW MSYS2 packages) but keep bumped minIO version#49945tadeja wants to merge 7 commits intoapache:mainfrom
tadeja wants to merge 7 commits intoapache:mainfrom
Conversation
tadeja
force-pushed
the
revert-pins-from-49931
branch
from
4f1af1b to
4c7390f
Compare
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Rationale for this change
Created as a future reminder to revert once failing tests from umbrella issue #49930 get resolved
See workaround PR discussion #49931 (review)
What changes are included in this PR?
Revert PR 49931 (Pin MinGW MSYS2 packages) - removing temporary workaround step
- name: Setup MSYS2completely.Are these changes tested?
/
Are there any user-facing changes?
No.