-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 960
Cleanups and minor fixes to the ADI remoteproc driver #3428
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Open
ukleinek
wants to merge
9
commits into
analogdevicesinc:adsp-6.18.31-y
Choose a base branch
from
ukleinek:remoteproc-adi
base: adsp-6.18.31-y
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
9 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
95ed86e
remoteproc: adi: Fix order of resource release in remove callback
ukleinek df5cdbe
remoteproc: adi: Call dmaengine_get() before using DMA
ukleinek 257f22b
remoteproc: adi: Fix error handling for devm_ioremap_wc()
ukleinek e2068b9
remoteproc: adi: Cleanup device_node pointers using __free
ukleinek 1549aeb
remoteproc: adi: Don't use of_match_ptr for the match table
ukleinek b45e96e
remoteproc: adi: Don't use a comma after the of_device_id terminator
ukleinek c2fb8c5
remoteproc: adi: Make use of devm_rproc_alloc()
ukleinek 0fc069c
remoteproc: adi: Convert to use dev_err_probe()
ukleinek 68d061b
remoteproc: adi: Fix commenting style
ukleinek File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yeah, style wise I really prefer just
if (!ret) return. But that's meThere was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
You mean
s/ret == 0/!ret/, right, and not to have the return on the same line as the if statement?