You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
we have orquesta, st2-auth-backend-flat-file, st2-auth-ldap and st2-rbac-backend affected by this.
I'm including Orquesta in the list, because its version is bumped manually once in several months or before the st2 release, but not on every change which results in the same result.
So doing a version bump/release in these repos might be one solution, but really just increases the overhead and maintenance burden as for every PR you want to do a repo release and then go to st2 repo requirements, updating the tag.
This would really reduce the maintenance burden, rather than increase it. The downside might be losing some modularity?
In a 3rd view, everything is about tradeoffs. Is it really a problem considering how frequently these repos change?
For st2 master, on every next push or merge the rebuild would already happen by automatically picking up the latest code. And we do update st2 frequently. On release, the changes will be picked up in any way as automation creates a vX.Y stable branch for every repo.
Activity
arm4b commentedon Apr 7, 2022
Based on https://github.com/StackStorm/st2/blob/e2e4e26381841e57193129a8b5beeefbe1c256aa/requirements.txt#L21-L25
we have
orquesta,st2-auth-backend-flat-file,st2-auth-ldapandst2-rbac-backendaffected by this.I'm including Orquesta in the list, because its version is bumped manually once in several months or before the st2 release, but not on every change which results in the same result.
So doing a version bump/release in these repos might be one solution, but really just increases the overhead and maintenance burden as for every PR you want to do a repo release and then go to st2 repo requirements, updating the tag.
The fundamental solution to me looks like fully moving both https://github.com/StackStorm/st2-rbac-backend and https://github.com/StackStorm/st2-auth-ldap codebase into the
st2repository. LDAP & RBAC have dedicated repositories just because these modules were enterprise and private before. Now both are core non-optional components of st2.This would really reduce the maintenance burden, rather than increase it. The downside might be losing some modularity?
In a 3rd view, everything is about tradeoffs. Is it really a problem considering how frequently these repos change?
For st2 master, on every next push or merge the rebuild would already happen by automatically picking up the latest code. And we do update st2 frequently. On release, the changes will be picked up in any way as automation creates a
vX.Ystable branch for every repo.cognifloyd commentedon Apr 28, 2022
We are already publishing st2client wheels in the
st2cdpack:https://github.com/StackStorm/st2cd/blob/0e7b5760a9163aedf486a071514e1d787392f444/actions/workflows/st2_finalize_release.yaml#L83-L87
So, we should be able to do something similar with
st2-auth-backend-flat-file,st2-auth-ldap,st2-rbac-backend, andorquesta.Of these 4, only
orquestahas been released on pypi before, but the release is out-of-date: https://pypi.org/project/orquesta/#historyI'm going to punt releasing these on pypi, or merging them into our st2 monorepo for a future release, not 3.7.0.