Skip to content

[CHORE](deps)(deps): Bump lowlydba/are-we-good from 1.2.0 to 1.2.2 - #774

Merged
John McCall (lowlydba) merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
dependabot/github_actions/lowlydba/are-we-good-1.2.2
Oct 8, 2026
Merged

John McCall (lowlydba) merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
dependabot/github_actions/lowlydba/are-we-good-1.2.2

Conversation

@dependabot

@dependabot dependabot Bot commented on behalf of github Oct 7, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Bumps lowlydba/are-we-good from 1.2.0 to 1.2.2.

Release notes

Sourced from lowlydba/are-we-good's releases.

v1.2.2

What's Changed

Full Changelog: lowlydba/are-we-good@v1.2.1...v1.2.2

v1.2.1

What's Changed

Full Changelog: lowlydba/are-we-good@v1.2.0...v1.2.1

Commits
  • 6b10e5f fix: make CLI banners accessible, trim README, default gh token (#59)
  • f9209e0 chore: add CodeQL analysis and clarify vulnerability reporting (#57)
  • d4a7765 Revise security policy and reporting instructions (#56)
  • ef1af60 chore: add OSSF Scorecard for security posture transparency (#55)
  • 1ecff0b fix: resolve PR head SHA for custom check runs on pull_request events (#54)
  • 3f015e8 chore(deps-dev): bump @​types/node from 26.4.1 to 26.5.1 (#53)
  • 5f6a50f chore(deps): bump zizmorcore/zizmor-action from 0.6.3 to 0.6.4 (#52)
  • b8171b9 chore(deps-dev): bump @​types/node from 26.4.0 to 26.4.1 (#51)
  • 7b21c0e chore(deps): bump zizmorcore/zizmor-action from 0.6.2 to 0.6.3 (#49)
  • 5685228 chore(deps-dev): bump @​types/node from 26.2.0 to 26.4.0 (#50)
  • See full diff in compare view

Dependabot compatibility score

Dependabot will resolve any conflicts with this PR as long as you don't alter it yourself. You can also trigger a rebase manually by commenting @dependabot rebase.


Dependabot commands and options

You can trigger Dependabot actions by commenting on this PR:

  • @dependabot rebase will rebase this PR
  • @dependabot recreate will recreate this PR, overwriting any edits that have been made to it
  • @dependabot show <dependency name> ignore conditions will show all of the ignore conditions of the specified dependency
  • @dependabot ignore this major version will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this major version (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself)
  • @dependabot ignore this minor version will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this minor version (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself)
  • @dependabot ignore this dependency will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this dependency (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself)

Bumps [lowlydba/are-we-good](https://github.com/lowlydba/are-we-good) from 1.2.0 to 1.2.2.
- [Release notes](https://github.com/lowlydba/are-we-good/releases)
- [Commits](lowlydba/are-we-good@0f90ea9...6b10e5f)

---
updated-dependencies:
- dependency-name: lowlydba/are-we-good
  dependency-version: 1.2.2
  dependency-type: direct:production
  update-type: version-update:semver-patch
...

Signed-off-by: dependabot[bot] <support@github.com>
@dependabot dependabot Bot added automation 🦾 Change/enhance automation of a process bot labels Oct 7, 2026
@dependabot
dependabot Bot requested review from a team and John McCall (lowlydba) as code owners October 7, 2026 22:56
@github-actions

github-actions Bot commented Oct 7, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

🗺️ Schema reference docs preview is live!

🌍 Preview https://staging.overturemaps.org/schema/pr/774/schema/index.html
🕐 Updated Oct 07, 2026 22:58 UTC
📝 Commit 41af60d
🔧 env SCHEMA_PREVIEW true

Note

♻️ This preview updates automatically with each push to this PR.

@lowlydba
John McCall (lowlydba) merged commit a8414c0 into main Oct 8, 2026
43 of 45 checks passed
@lowlydba
John McCall (lowlydba) deleted the dependabot/github_actions/lowlydba/are-we-good-1.2.2 branch October 8, 2026 13:30

This branch was successfully deployed

1 active deployment
staging — 41af60d3 Deployed Oct 7, 2026 by dependabot[bot] via Deploy #593
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

automation 🦾 Change/enhance automation of a process bot

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants