Add concept name-update command

[jamlung-ri]

Summary

• Adds concept name-update OWNER SOURCE CONCEPT_ID NAME_UUID command to update an existing concept name's text, locale, type, locale-preferred flag, or external ID
• Updates concept names --verbose to include a UUID column so users can look up the UUID required for name-update
• Adds OCLAPIClient.update_concept_name() in api_client.py (issues PUT to .../names/{uuid}/)

Usage

# Find the UUID of the name to update
ocl concept names OWNER SOURCE CONCEPT_ID --verbose

# Update only the fields you want to change
ocl concept name-update OWNER SOURCE CONCEPT_ID NAME_UUID --name "New text"
ocl concept name-update OWNER SOURCE CONCEPT_ID NAME_UUID --locale fr --name-type Synonym
ocl concept name-update OWNER SOURCE CONCEPT_ID NAME_UUID --locale-preferred
ocl concept name-update OWNER SOURCE CONCEPT_ID NAME_UUID --no-locale-preferred

Test plan

• ocl concept names OWNER SOURCE CONCEPT_ID --verbose shows a UUID column
• ocl concept name-update ... --name "..." updates the name text and prints the updated name
• ocl concept name-update ... with no options prints an error and exits non-zero
• -j flag returns raw JSON from the API
• Invalid UUID returns a clear API error

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

[paynejd]

Thanks @jamlung-ri — I reviewed this against the API and it's in good shape. I confirmed the update endpoint (ConceptNameRetrieveUpdateDestroyView in oclapi2) forces partial=True, so issuing a PUT with only the changed fields is safe — it won't wipe the untouched ones. The new UUID column on names --verbose is a nice touch for finding the value name-update needs, and this rounds out the existing name-add well.

Two things before I merge:

1. Add a test. Add concept list command #10 (just merged) introduced a lightweight pattern for exactly this in tests/test_concept_commands.py — a CliRunner with a fake client, asserting the command calls the client method with the expected kwargs. A short mirror of that for name-update (including the "no fields → non-zero exit" case) would cover it.
2. File a tracking ticket in OpenConceptLab/ocl_issues and link it here. Heads up that we hadn't actually written "every PR links an issue" down in this repo — that's on us, and I'm fixing the docs — but going forward we'd like each PR to reference one.

(README is already updated 👍 — an optional one-line entry in docs/demos/ would round it out.)

Once the test's in, I'll merge. Thanks!