Snow cover fraction for Advancing Arctic Capabilities Programme#105
Open
Richard Essery (RichardEssery) wants to merge 19 commits into
Open
Snow cover fraction for Advancing Arctic Capabilities Programme#105Richard Essery (RichardEssery) wants to merge 19 commits into
Richard Essery (RichardEssery) wants to merge 19 commits into
Conversation
| @@ -62,6 +67,7 @@ SUBROUTINE tilepts(land_pts,frac,surft_pts,surft_index,l_lice_point, & | |||
| !$OMP elev_ice, elev_rock, l_lice_point, l_lice_surft, & | |||
| !$OMP l_elev_land_ice, surft_pts ) & | |||
| !$OMP PRIVATE( l, n, c, use_tile ) | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Suggested change
| !$OMP PRIVATE( l, n, c, use_tile ) | |
| !$OMP PRIVATE( l, n, c, use_tile, snow_tile ) |
| @@ -62,6 +67,7 @@ SUBROUTINE tilepts(land_pts,frac,surft_pts,surft_index,l_lice_point, & | |||
| !$OMP elev_ice, elev_rock, l_lice_point, l_lice_surft, & | |||
| !$OMP l_elev_land_ice, surft_pts ) & | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Suggested change
| !$OMP l_elev_land_ice, surft_pts ) & | |
| !$OMP l_elev_land_ice, surft_pts, i_snow_tile ) & |
|
When I ran the LFRic rose-stem test with this JULES branch there were a few tests that failed due to variables not being included in the OMP statement in the tilepts subroutine. I haven't had a chance to run the UM rose-stem tests yet but I imagine that will produce similar complaints. I've added suggestions for the changes I think are needed to get rid of those errors. |
Author
|
Hi Helen,
I didn't need to/couldn't test OMP declarations in my compilation of JULES, but whatever you need to pass the test should be OK. I would not expect tilepts to be the only place this arises.
Richard
From: Helen Johnson ***@***.***>
Sent: 10 July 2026 13:57
To: MetOffice/jules ***@***.***>
Cc: Richard Essery ***@***.***>; Assign ***@***.***>
Subject: Re: [MetOffice/jules] Snow cover fraction for Advancing Arctic Capabilities Programme (PR #105)
[https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/138898055?s=20&v=4]HelenRJohnson left a comment (MetOffice/jules#105)<#105 (comment)>
When I ran the LFRic rose-stem test with this JULES branch there were a few tests that failed due to variables not being included in the OMP statement in the tilepts subroutine. I haven't had a chance to run the UM rose-stem tests yet but I imagine that will produce similar complaints. I've added suggestions for the changes I think are needed to get rid of those errors.
-
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub<#105?email_source=notifications&email_token=AC24BEWMB4MQ7NLU732YWAL5EDRZ3A5CNFSNUABFM5UWIORPF5TWS5BNNB2WEL2JONZXKZKDN5WW2ZLOOQXTIOJTGU2TCNRWGUYKM4TFMFZW63VGMFZXG2LHN2SWK5TFNZ2KYZTPN52GK4S7MNWGSY3L#issuecomment-4935516650>, or unsubscribe<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AC24BETEL2KHXF2R6AUZIWT5EDRZ3AVCNFSNUABGKJSXA33TNF2G64TZHMYTAOBWGUZTENJQGI5US43TOVSTWNBSHA4DIMZWHAYDBILWAI>.
Triage notifications, keep track of coding agent tasks and review pull requests on the go with GitHub Mobile for iOS<https://github.com/notifications/mobile/ios/AC24BEV5TKIKIFYDKEFPNXD5EDRZ3A5CNFSNUABFM5UWIORPF5TWS5BNNB2WEL2JONZXKZKDN5WW2ZLOOQXTIOJTGU2TCNRWGUYKM4TFMFZW63VGMFZXG2LHN2SWK5TFNZ2KUZTPN52GK4S7NFXXG> and Android<https://github.com/notifications/mobile/android/AC24BEXX7KP4GJT4XIJXBMD5EDRZ3A5CNFSNUABFM5UWIORPF5TWS5BNNB2WEL2JONZXKZKDN5WW2ZLOOQXTIOJTGU2TCNRWGUYKM4TFMFZW63VGMFZXG2LHN2SWK5TFNZ2K4ZTPN52GK4S7MFXGI4TPNFSA>. Download it today!
You are receiving this because you were assigned.Message ID: ***@***.******@***.***>>
The University of Edinburgh is a charitable body, registered in Scotland, with registration number SC005336. Is e buidheann carthannais a th' ann an Oilthigh Dh?n ?ideann, cl?raichte an Alba, ?ireamh cl?raidh SC005336.
|
|
Ah, OK, maybe that was just the first subroutine to fail then, I'll check out a copy of the code then and see how many places need variables adding to OMP statements before the tests pass. |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
PR Summary
Sci/Tech Reviewer:
Code Reviewer: R Sharp (@r-sharp)
Option to have a separate surface energy balance for the snow-covered fraction of short vegetation and bare soil tiles
Code Quality Checklist
(Some checks are automatically carried out via the CI pipeline)
readability of the code
rose-meta/jules-sharedthen have you supplied a linked UM PR?Testing
stem suites
acceptable (eg. kgo changes)
tests, unit tests, etc.)
trac.log
Security Considerations
Performance Impact
performance measurements have been conducted
AI Assistance and Attribution
of Generative AI tool name (e.g., Met Office Github Copilot Enterprise,
Github Copilot Personal, ChatGPT GPT-4, etc) and I have followed the
Simulation Systems AI policy
(including attribution labels)
Documentation
confirmed that it builds correctly
Approvals
Please request all relevant approvals. See the CodeOwners.txt file for section
owners.
Technical
Scientific
Sci/Tech Review
Please alert the code reviewer via a tag when you have approved the SR
Code Review