Test to reproduce OP_EQUALVERIFY issue

[enaples]

Important

26.04 FREEZE March 11th: Non-bugfix PRs not ready by this date will wait for 26.06.

RC1 is scheduled on March 23rd

The final release is scheduled for April 15th.

Checklist

Before submitting the PR, ensure the following tasks are completed. If an item is not applicable to your PR, please mark it as checked:

• The changelog has been updated in the relevant commit(s) according to the guidelines.
• Tests have been added or modified to reflect the changes.
• Documentation has been reviewed and updated as needed.
• Related issues have been listed and linked, including any that this PR closes.
• Important All PRs must consider how to reverse any persistent changes for tools/lightning-downgrade

Test to reproduce OP_EQUALVERIFY issues (#8674 and #4871 ) taking into account the new format of hsm_secret (mnemonic).

Changelog-None

[cdecker]

Rebased on top of master to see if it passes.

[Lagrang3]

I don't understand how this test is useful.
You remove the hsm_secret file, then no wonder why you can't spend those funds.

Should we be testing the transition from the old hsm_secret format to the new one?
I don't think we support such transition. You just get a completely different set of secrets, even the node id changes AFAIK.
@sangbida

[enaples]

True. The only purpose of this test is to reproduce the pointed issue.

No need to be merged because it is expected to fail.

[Lagrang3]

True. The only purpose of this test is to reproduce the pointed issue.

No need to be merged because it's is expected to fail.

@enaples thank you.
I am closing this.