fix: missing inputs to workflow dispatch

[LesnyRumcajs]

Summary of changes

Changes introduced in this pull request:

• inputs, referenced later in the workflow, are missing. This fixes it.

Reference issue to close (if applicable)

Closes

Other information and links

Change checklist

• I have performed a self-review of my own code,
• I have made corresponding changes to the documentation. All new code adheres to the team's documentation standards,
• I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works (if possible),
• I have made sure the CHANGELOG is up-to-date. All user-facing changes should be reflected in this document.

Summary by CodeRabbit

• New Features
  • The RPC parity workflow now includes a configurable image parameter, allowing users to optionally specify a custom container image during workflow execution while maintaining backward compatibility with the existing default value.

_{✏️ Tip: You can customize this high-level summary in your review settings.}

[coderabbitai]

Walkthrough

A workflow_dispatch input parameter named "image" is added to the RPC parity GitHub Actions workflow configuration. The input is optional with a default value of ghcr.io/chainsafe/forest:edge-fat, and the existing logic that reads this input remains compatible.

Changes

Cohort / File(s)	Summary
GitHub Actions Workflow Configuration .github/workflows/rpc-parity.yml	Added workflow_dispatch input parameter "image" with description and default value to expose configurable image parameter for workflow runs

Estimated code review effort

🎯 2 (Simple) | ⏱️ ~5 minutes

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 3

✅ Passed checks (3 passed)

Check name	Status	Explanation
Description Check	✅ Passed	Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Title check	✅ Passed	The title accurately describes the main change: adding missing inputs to the workflow_dispatch trigger in the RPC parity GitHub Actions workflow.
Docstring Coverage	✅ Passed	No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.

_{✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings.}

---

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.}

[codecov]

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 58.76%. Comparing base (de93062) to head (c5158a0).
⚠️ Report is 3 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

see 6 files with indirect coverage changes

---

Continue to review full report in Codecov by Sentry.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update de93062...c5158a0. Read the comment docs.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.