-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 869
Add console command to reveal cave and dungeon names #9495
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Open
Kiousu
wants to merge
13
commits into
Card-Forge:master
Choose a base branch
from
Kiousu:master
base: master
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
13 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
99f51dd
Add console command to reveal cave and dungeon names
db5fbcb
Merge branch 'Card-Forge:master' into master
Kiousu d673426
Allow reveal command to accept POI types
Kiousu d023fb2
Merge branch 'Card-Forge:master' into master
Kiousu a253c0a
added city as an alias of town
Kiousu b06bdf4
Merge branch 'Card-Forge:master' into master
Kiousu ca9819d
Merge branch 'master' into master
Kiousu 90a5332
Merge branch 'Card-Forge:master' into master
Kiousu 2cac37a
Merge branch 'Card-Forge:master' into master
Kiousu 87ab265
Merge branch 'Card-Forge:master' into master
Kiousu 6965333
Merge branch 'Card-Forge:master' into master
Kiousu 51225ea
Merge branch 'Card-Forge:master' into master
Kiousu 7e74ac5
Merge branch 'master' into master
Kiousu File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think including logic for normalizing plurals and synonyms is a bit excessive for a developer console.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I don’t see this as adding “smart” logic to the console — just making it less brittle.
The previous review itself referred to the town POI as a “city,” which highlights the core issue: even contributors don’t reliably remember the exact internal identifiers. Requiring exact string matches makes the console fragile and forces people to look up data definitions.
The normalization here is intentionally minimal (simple plurals and a few explicit aliases like city → town). It’s not general NLP — just a thin layer to prevent avoidable friction.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The previous review wasn't from a contributor. As far as I can tell, that was their first comment on any Forge PR or issue.
I generally agree that having to look these kinds of parameters up is annoying, but haven't you resolved that by including the list of examples in your error message?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I see. My mistake.
That’s fair. I'll remove the normalization when I get the chance.