Skip to content

DPC-5710: Move DPC portal onto CDAP service module - #620

Merged
jscott-nava merged 8 commits into
mainfrom
jscott/DPC-5710
Oct 6, 2026
Merged

jscott-nava merged 8 commits into
mainfrom
jscott/DPC-5710

Conversation

@jscott-nava

@jscott-nava jscott-nava commented Oct 2, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

🎫 Ticket

https://jira.cms.gov/browse/DPC-5710

🛠 Changes

This PR contains updates that were required in order to move the DPC portal service onto the CDAP service module. A corresponding PR with DPC portal service changes can be found here.

ℹ️ Context

These changes are part of a larger effort to standardize IAC across the DDIP program by utilizing common modules in the CDAP repository.

🧪 Validation

Please refer to the related dpc-ops PR for validation details.

@jscott-nava
jscott-nava marked this pull request as ready for review October 2, 2026 22:35
@jscott-nava
jscott-nava requested a review from a team as a code owner October 2, 2026 22:35

@mianava mianava left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

These changes seem like they're making our work more efficient, shifting to a list from dedicated variables, is that the motivation for restructuring the variables?

@jscott-nava

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

These changes seem like they're making our work more efficient, shifting to a list from dedicated variables, is that the motivation for restructuring the variables?

@mianava This change was made to account for the api and attribution services, both of which expose two ports in their Service Connect configurations. So converting the standalone variables into a list of objects seemed the way to go, even though the portal service itself exposes only one port.

@jscott-nava
jscott-nava merged commit b6e6313 into main Oct 6, 2026
5 checks passed
@jscott-nava
jscott-nava deleted the jscott/DPC-5710 branch October 6, 2026 19:52
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants