Skip to content

Conversation

@mohithshuka
Copy link

@mohithshuka mohithshuka commented Jan 15, 2026

In raising this pull request, I confirm the following (please check boxes):

  • I have read and understood the contributors guide.
  • I have checked that another pull request for this purpose does not exist.
  • I have considered, and confirmed that this submission will be valuable to others.
  • I accept that this submission may not be used, and the pull request closed at the will of the maintainer.
  • I give this submission freely, and claim no ownership to its content.
  • I have mentioned this change in the changelog.

My familiarity with the project is as follows (check one):

  • I have never used CCExtractor.
  • I have used CCExtractor just a couple of times.
  • I absolutely love CCExtractor, but have not contributed previously.
  • I am an active contributor to CCExtractor.

{pull request content here}

@ccextractor-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

CCExtractor CI platform finished running the test files on linux. Below is a summary of the test results, when compared to test for commit 2028754...:
Report Name Tests Passed
Broken 13/13
CEA-708 14/14
DVB 7/7
DVD 3/3
DVR-MS 2/2
General 25/27
Hardsubx 1/1
Hauppage 3/3
MP4 3/3
NoCC 10/10
Options 81/86
Teletext 21/21
WTV 13/13
XDS 34/34

Your PR breaks these cases:

  • ccextractor --autoprogram --out=ttxt --latin1 --ucla dab1c1bd65...
  • ccextractor --out=srt --latin1 --autoprogram 29e5ffd34b...
  • ccextractor --startcreditstext "CCextractor Start crdit Testing" c4dd893cb9...
  • ccextractor --startcreditsnotbefore 1 --startcreditstext "CCextractor Start crdit Testing" c4dd893cb9...
  • ccextractor --startcreditsnotafter 2 --startcreditstext "CCextractor Start crdit Testing" c4dd893cb9...
  • ccextractor --startcreditsforatleast 1 --startcreditstext "CCextractor Start crdit Testing" c4dd893cb9...
  • ccextractor --startcreditsforatmost 2 --startcreditstext "CCextractor Start crdit Testing" c4dd893cb9...

Congratulations: Merging this PR would fix the following tests:

  • ccextractor --autoprogram --out=srt --latin1 --quant 0 85271be4d2..., Last passed: Never
  • ccextractor --out=spupng c83f765c66..., Last passed: Never

It seems that not all tests were passed completely. This is an indication that the output of some files is not as expected (but might be according to you).

Check the result page for more info.

@ccextractor-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

CCExtractor CI platform finished running the test files on windows. Below is a summary of the test results, when compared to test for commit 2028754...:
Report Name Tests Passed
Broken 13/13
CEA-708 14/14
DVB 6/7
DVD 3/3
DVR-MS 2/2
General 25/27
Hardsubx 1/1
Hauppage 3/3
MP4 3/3
NoCC 10/10
Options 81/86
Teletext 21/21
WTV 13/13
XDS 34/34

Your PR breaks these cases:

  • ccextractor --autoprogram --out=srt --latin1 --quant 0 85271be4d2...
  • ccextractor --autoprogram --out=ttxt --latin1 --ucla dab1c1bd65...
  • ccextractor --out=srt --latin1 --autoprogram 29e5ffd34b...
  • ccextractor --startcreditstext "CCextractor Start crdit Testing" c4dd893cb9...
  • ccextractor --startcreditsnotbefore 1 --startcreditstext "CCextractor Start crdit Testing" c4dd893cb9...
  • ccextractor --startcreditsnotafter 2 --startcreditstext "CCextractor Start crdit Testing" c4dd893cb9...
  • ccextractor --startcreditsforatleast 1 --startcreditstext "CCextractor Start crdit Testing" c4dd893cb9...
  • ccextractor --startcreditsforatmost 2 --startcreditstext "CCextractor Start crdit Testing" c4dd893cb9...

Congratulations: Merging this PR would fix the following tests:


It seems that not all tests were passed completely. This is an indication that the output of some files is not as expected (but might be according to you).

Check the result page for more info.

@mohithshuka
Copy link
Author

Hi, thanks for the CI feedback.

The failing Linux and Windows CI jobs appear to be due to test expectations that rely on the previous CLI error message when no input file is provided. Since this PR updates that message, I believe the related CLI tests need to be updated accordingly.

I’m currently checking the failing test cases to align the expected output with the new behavior. Please let me know if there is a preferred location or approach for updating these tests.

Thanks for your time and guidance.

@cfsmp3
Copy link
Contributor

cfsmp3 commented Jan 17, 2026

The right approach would be to improve the argument parser in Rust - not to do this in C which we are deprecating.

@cfsmp3 cfsmp3 closed this Jan 17, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants