Skip to content

chore(deps): update dependency vite to v8.0.14#88

Open
renovate[bot] wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
renovate/vite-8.x
Open

chore(deps): update dependency vite to v8.0.14#88
renovate[bot] wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
renovate/vite-8.x

Conversation

@renovate
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@renovate renovate Bot commented Apr 20, 2026

This PR contains the following updates:

Package Change Age Confidence
vite (source) 8.0.88.0.14 age confidence

Release Notes

vitejs/vite (vite)

v8.0.14

Compare Source

Features
Bug Fixes
Miscellaneous Chores
  • deps: update rolldown-related dependencies (#​22470) (7cb728e)
  • remove irrelevant commits from changelog (2c69495)
Code Refactoring
Tests

v8.0.13

Compare Source

Features
Bug Fixes
Miscellaneous Chores

v8.0.12

Compare Source

Features
Bug Fixes
  • create-vite: pass react framework to TanStack CLI (#​22397) (18f0f90)
  • deps: update all non-major dependencies (#​22420) (2be6000)
  • module-runner: prevent partial-exports race on concurrent imports of in-flight invalidated re-export chains (#​22369) (f5a22e6)
  • refer to rolldownOptions instead of deprecated rollupOptions in messages (#​22400) (b675c7b)
  • worker: apply build.target to worker bundle (#​22404) (3c93fde)
  • worker: forward define to worker bundle transform (#​22408) (d4838a0)
Miscellaneous Chores

v8.0.11

Compare Source

Features
Bug Fixes
Documentation
Miscellaneous Chores
Code Refactoring
Tests

v8.0.10

Compare Source

Features
Bug Fixes
  • hmrClient.logger.debug and hmrClient.logger.error looked different from other HMR logs (#​22147) (a4d828f)
  • css: show filename in CSS minification warnings for .css?inline (#​22292) (83f0a78)
  • optimizer: allow user transform.target to override default in optimizeDeps (#​22273) (5c7cec6)
  • remove format sniffing module resolution from JS resolver (#​22297) (b8a21cc)
Code Refactoring

v8.0.9

Compare Source

Features
Bug Fixes
Documentation
Miscellaneous Chores

Configuration

📅 Schedule: (in timezone Africa/Johannesburg)

  • Branch creation
    • At any time (no schedule defined)
  • Automerge
    • At any time (no schedule defined)

🚦 Automerge: Enabled.

Rebasing: Whenever PR is behind base branch, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about this update again.


  • If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

This PR was generated by Mend Renovate. View the repository job log.

@renovate renovate Bot added the renovate label Apr 20, 2026
@github-actions
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

github-actions Bot commented Apr 20, 2026

📚 Docs preview deployed

https://scratchyjs-docs-pr-88.asjas.workers.dev

Updates automatically on every push to this PR.

@github-actions
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

github-actions Bot commented Apr 20, 2026

⚡ Benchmark Results

benchmarks/renderer/ring-buffer.bench.ts
Suite — Benchmark ops/sec mean (µs) p99 (µs) ±rme vs main
SharedRingBuffer – small payload (64 B) — write 64 bytes 575.7 K 0.0017 0.0061 ±1.40% +6.1%
SharedRingBuffer – small payload (64 B) — write + read 64 bytes 454.7 K 0.0022 0.0073 ±1.88% -13.6% ⚠️
SharedRingBuffer – medium payload (1 KB) — write 1 KB 293.3 K 0.0034 0.0129 ±0.61% -15.5% ⚠️
SharedRingBuffer – medium payload (1 KB) — write + read 1 KB 250.7 K 0.0040 0.0154 ±0.48% -3.6%
SharedRingBuffer – large payload (16 KB) — write 16 KB 36.7 K 0.0273 0.0481 ±0.60% -37.0% ⚠️
SharedRingBuffer – large payload (16 KB) — write + read 16 KB 107.2 K 0.0093 0.0453 ±3.08% +39.2% 🚀
SharedRingBuffer – sequential throughput (100 × 64 B) — 100 write + read cycles 45.2 K 0.0221 0.0370 ±1.42% +11.3% 🚀
SharedRingBuffer – introspection — availableToRead 14.95 M 0.0001 0.0001 ±0.11% ~0%
SharedRingBuffer – introspection — isEmpty 14.73 M 0.0001 0.0001 ±0.11% ~0%
SharedRingBuffer – introspection — isFull 14.62 M 0.0001 0.0001 ±0.11% ~0%
benchmarks/renderer/shared-buffer.bench.ts
Suite — Benchmark ops/sec mean (µs) p99 (µs) ±rme vs main
SharedBuffer – allocation — createSharedBuffer(4 KB) 624.6 K 0.0016 0.0062 ±0.96% -12.4% ⚠️
SharedBuffer – allocation — createSharedBuffer(64 KB) 39.5 K 0.0253 0.0459 ±14.74% -30.0% ⚠️
SharedBuffer – small payload round-trip — write small JSON 333.9 K 0.0030 0.0099 ±0.40% -7.1%
SharedBuffer – small payload round-trip — write + read small JSON 245.7 K 0.0041 0.0112 ±0.43% -10.2% ⚠️
SharedBuffer – medium payload round-trip — write medium JSON (~2 KB) 99.3 K 0.0101 0.0261 ±1.17% +11.6% 🚀
SharedBuffer – medium payload round-trip — write + read medium JSON (~2 KB) 58.6 K 0.0171 0.0365 ±0.40% ~0%
SharedBuffer – large payload round-trip — write large JSON (~10 KB) 15.1 K 0.0662 0.1790 ±0.81% -2.2%
SharedBuffer – large payload round-trip — write + read large JSON (~10 KB) 7.9 K 0.1268 0.1705 ±0.56% ~0%
benchmarks/utils/ip-address.bench.ts
Suite — Benchmark ops/sec mean (µs) p99 (µs) ±rme vs main
getClientIPAddress – no IP headers — no IP-related headers → null 2.66 M 0.0004 0.0007 ±1.18% ~0%
getClientIPAddress – single header — cf-connecting-ip (Cloudflare) 1.59 M 0.0006 0.0011 ±1.13% -4.8%
getClientIPAddress – single header — x-forwarded-for (simple) 1.89 M 0.0005 0.0009 ±0.34% -2.1%
getClientIPAddress – single header — x-real-ip 1.44 M 0.0007 0.0012 ±1.28% -3.5%
getClientIPAddress – single header — true-client-ip (Akamai / Cloudflare Enterprise) 1.54 M 0.0006 0.0009 ±1.16% ~0%
getClientIPAddress – x-forwarded-for multi-hop — 2-hop chain 1.72 M 0.0006 0.0009 ±0.11% -1.3%
getClientIPAddress – x-forwarded-for multi-hop — 4-hop chain 1.57 M 0.0006 0.0011 ±0.33% -5.9%
getClientIPAddress – Forwarded header (RFC 7239) — simple for= directive 925.5 K 0.0011 0.0020 ±1.53% -8.7%
getClientIPAddress – Forwarded header (RFC 7239) — for= with port 724.4 K 0.0014 0.0021 ±0.38% ~0%
getClientIPAddress – Forwarded header (RFC 7239) — IPv6 literal 700.4 K 0.0014 0.0023 ±2.01% -7.9%
getClientIPAddress – Forwarded header (RFC 7239) — multi-hop Forwarded 781.7 K 0.0013 0.0023 ±2.52% -7.2%
getClientIPAddress – IPv6 addresses — x-forwarded-for IPv6 1.14 M 0.0009 0.0013 ±0.36% ~0%
benchmarks/utils/promise.bench.ts
Suite — Benchmark ops/sec mean (µs) p99 (µs) ±rme vs main
promiseHash – concurrent resolution — 2 already-resolved promises 830.9 K 0.0012 0.0034 ±1.17% -2.9%
promiseHash – concurrent resolution — 5 already-resolved promises 488.3 K 0.0020 0.0030 ±1.44% -6.8%
promiseHash – concurrent resolution — 10 already-resolved promises 265.7 K 0.0038 0.0093 ±1.68% -6.8%
promiseHash – concurrent resolution — 5 promises with object values 403.4 K 0.0025 0.0060 ±1.51% -17.0% ⚠️
timeout – wrapping fast promises — timeout wrapping an already-resolved promise (1 s budget) 898.0 K 0.0011 0.0019 ±0.52% -7.3%
timeout – wrapping fast promises — timeout wrapping an already-resolved object (5 s budget) 830.2 K 0.0012 0.0021 ±1.62% -11.2% ⚠️
benchmarks/utils/safe-redirect.bench.ts
Suite — Benchmark ops/sec mean (µs) p99 (µs) ±rme vs main
safeRedirect – valid paths — root path / 7.40 M 0.0001 0.0002 ±0.24% +9.3%
safeRedirect – valid paths — simple path /dashboard 3.86 M 0.0003 0.0003 ±0.12% +6.7%
safeRedirect – valid paths — nested path /settings/profile 3.27 M 0.0003 0.0005 ±0.25% +2.3%
safeRedirect – valid paths — path with query string /search?q=hello 3.53 M 0.0003 0.0004 ±0.13% +1.1%
safeRedirect – valid paths — path with hash /docs#section 3.65 M 0.0003 0.0004 ±0.26% +1.5%
safeRedirect – rejected inputs — absolute URL https://evil.com 4.86 M 0.0002 0.0003 ±0.12% +5.3%
safeRedirect – rejected inputs — protocol-relative URL //evil.com 5.11 M 0.0002 0.0002 ±0.12% +13.4% 🚀
safeRedirect – rejected inputs — backslash-relative /\evil.com 4.98 M 0.0002 0.0003 ±0.12% +7.6%
safeRedirect – rejected inputs — path traversal /../etc/passwd 4.55 M 0.0002 0.0003 ±0.11% +10.7% 🚀
safeRedirect – rejected inputs — null input 16.17 M 0.0001 0.0001 ±0.11% ~0%
safeRedirect – rejected inputs — undefined input 16.19 M 0.0001 0.0001 ±0.11% ~0%
safeRedirect – rejected inputs — empty string 16.18 M 0.0001 0.0001 ±0.11% ~0%
safeRedirect – percent-encoded bypass — percent-encoded // (%2F%2F) 4.91 M 0.0002 0.0002 ±0.38% +3.2%
safeRedirect – percent-encoded bypass — percent-encoded path traversal (%2e%2e) 4.80 M 0.0002 0.0003 ±0.11% ~0%
safeRedirect – percent-encoded bypass — mixed percent-encoded absolute URL 4.75 M 0.0002 0.0003 ±0.29% +3.8%
safeRedirect – custom default redirect — valid path with custom default 3.89 M 0.0003 0.0003 ±0.11% +3.8%
safeRedirect – custom default redirect — invalid input with custom default 4.87 M 0.0002 0.0003 ±0.24% +1.4%

🔬 Compared against the latest benchmark run on main. ⚠️ = >10% slower · 🚀 = >10% faster.

@renovate renovate Bot assigned Asjas Apr 20, 2026
@renovate renovate Bot force-pushed the renovate/vite-8.x branch 3 times, most recently from d4b0d0c to 5294ef8 Compare April 23, 2026 10:49
@renovate renovate Bot changed the title chore(deps): update dependency vite to v8.0.9 chore(deps): update dependency vite to v8.0.10 Apr 23, 2026
@renovate renovate Bot force-pushed the renovate/vite-8.x branch from 5294ef8 to 15f322d Compare April 29, 2026 20:48
@renovate renovate Bot force-pushed the renovate/vite-8.x branch from 15f322d to cf58398 Compare May 7, 2026 09:10
@renovate renovate Bot changed the title chore(deps): update dependency vite to v8.0.10 chore(deps): update dependency vite to v8.0.11 May 7, 2026
@renovate renovate Bot changed the title chore(deps): update dependency vite to v8.0.11 chore(deps): update dependency vite to v8.0.12 May 11, 2026
@renovate renovate Bot force-pushed the renovate/vite-8.x branch 3 times, most recently from 064629c to e0cf1d2 Compare May 14, 2026 12:54
@renovate renovate Bot changed the title chore(deps): update dependency vite to v8.0.12 chore(deps): update dependency vite to v8.0.13 May 14, 2026
@renovate renovate Bot force-pushed the renovate/vite-8.x branch from e0cf1d2 to 3dd92c2 Compare May 18, 2026 09:47
@renovate renovate Bot force-pushed the renovate/vite-8.x branch from 3dd92c2 to 3788691 Compare May 21, 2026 10:39
@renovate renovate Bot changed the title chore(deps): update dependency vite to v8.0.13 chore(deps): update dependency vite to v8.0.14 May 21, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant