Skip to content

Remove Verbiage of "issue_type" Being the Correct Filter in List Issues#185

Open
nox7 wants to merge 1 commit intoAccelo:mainfrom
nox7:fix-unworking-issue-doc
Open

Remove Verbiage of "issue_type" Being the Correct Filter in List Issues#185
nox7 wants to merge 1 commit intoAccelo:mainfrom
nox7:fix-unworking-issue-doc

Conversation

@nox7
Copy link

@nox7 nox7 commented Jan 30, 2026

In the current Accelo docs under List Issues and Basic Filtering, it incorrectly states to use "issue_type" for filtering by the "issue_type_id" - however, this filter does not work and leads developers to incorrect and frustrating results.

The "type" filter must be used. While "type" is listed as deprecated in the actual object documentation, the docs should still be relevant and correct to what actually, currently functions. Postman example below.

First image, we see we attempt to use "issue_type" in the filter

image

However, we get results back that are not just of that issue_type_id.

In the second image, when using "type" we get the correct results.

image

Currently "issue_type" does not function as a valid or useful filter. This PR removes it from the List Issues docs and removes deprecation notice of "type" because there is currently no other way to filer by type.

Updated issue filtering parameters and marked some as deprecated.
@nox7 nox7 requested review from cebjyre and pfbaz as code owners January 30, 2026 15:00
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant