diff --git a/examples/game/thoughtproof_evaluator_example.py b/examples/game/thoughtproof_evaluator_example.py
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..39afecc
--- /dev/null
+++ b/examples/game/thoughtproof_evaluator_example.py
@@ -0,0 +1,156 @@
+"""
+ThoughtProof Reasoning Evaluator for GAME SDK / Virtuals ACP
+
+Verifies whether an agent's deliverable is well-reasoned before accepting payment.
+Uses adversarial multi-model critique (Claude, Grok, DeepSeek) — returns ALLOW, BLOCK, or UNCERTAIN.
+
+Payment: x402, $0.005-$0.10 USDC on Base per evaluation (stake-based).
+API: https://api.thoughtproof.ai/v1/check
+Docs: https://thoughtproof.ai/skill.md
+"""
+
+import httpx
+import json
+import os
+from typing import Optional
+
+
+# ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
+# Option 1: One-liner (recommended)
+# ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
+# from thoughtproof_evaluator import thoughtproof_evaluator
+#
+# acp_client = VirtualsACP(
+#     ...,
+#     on_evaluate=thoughtproof_evaluator(),
+# )
+# ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
+
+
+def thoughtproof_evaluator(
+    stake_level: str = "medium",
+    domain: str = "general",
+    min_confidence: float = 0.60,
+):
+    """
+    Returns an on_evaluate callback that uses ThoughtProof to verify
+    whether a job deliverable is well-reasoned before accepting payment.
+
+    Args:
+        stake_level: "low" | "medium" | "high" | "critical"
+        domain: "financial" | "code" | "medical" | "legal" | "general"
+        min_confidence: minimum confidence to auto-accept (0.0-1.0)
+
+    Requires: x402 payment of $0.02-$0.05 USDC on Base per evaluation.
+    Set THOUGHTPROOF_PAYMENT_WALLET env var or use purl CLI for testing.
+    """
+
+    def on_evaluate(job) -> None:
+        from virtuals_acp import ACPJobPhase
+
+        for memo in job.memos:
+            if memo.next_phase != ACPJobPhase.COMPLETED:
+                continue
+
+            deliverable = getattr(memo, "content", "") or ""
+
+            # Basic sanity check
+            if not deliverable or len(deliverable.strip()) < 10:
+                print(f"[ThoughtProof] Job {job.id}: REJECTED — deliverable too short")
+                job.evaluate(False)
+                return
+
+            # Call ThoughtProof
+            claim = f"Agent deliverable for job {job.id}: {deliverable[:500]}"
+
+            try:
+                result = _check_reasoning(claim, stake_level, domain)
+            except Exception as e:
+                print(f"[ThoughtProof] Job {job.id}: API error ({e}) — auto-accepting")
+                job.evaluate(True)
+                return
+
+            verdict = result.get("verdict", "UNCERTAIN")
+            confidence = result.get("confidence", 0.5)
+            objections = result.get("objections", [])
+
+            print(f"[ThoughtProof] Job {job.id}: verdict={verdict} confidence={confidence:.2f}")
+            if objections:
+                print(f"[ThoughtProof] Objections: {'; '.join(objections[:2])}")
+
+            if verdict == "ALLOW" and confidence >= min_confidence:
+                job.evaluate(True)
+            elif verdict == "BLOCK":
+                job.evaluate(False)
+            else:
+                # UNCERTAIN — safe escalation state, flag for human review
+                print(f"[ThoughtProof] Job {job.id}: {verdict} — accepting with review flag")
+                job.evaluate(True)
+
+    return on_evaluate
+
+
+# ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
+# Option 2: Inline reasoning check (no extra package)
+# ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
+
+def _check_reasoning(
+    claim: str,
+    stake_level: str = "medium",
+    domain: str = "general",
+) -> dict:
+    """
+    Call ThoughtProof API. Handles x402 payment challenge.
+
+    Returns: {"verdict": "ALLOW"|"BLOCK"|"UNCERTAIN", "confidence": float, ...}
+    Raises: ValueError if payment required but no wallet configured.
+    Raises: httpx.HTTPError on network failure.
+    """
+    api_url = "https://api.thoughtproof.ai/v1/check"
+    payload = {"claim": claim, "stakeLevel": stake_level, "domain": domain}
+
+    with httpx.Client(timeout=120) as client:
+        resp = client.post(api_url, json=payload)
+
+        if resp.status_code == 200:
+            return resp.json()
+
+        if resp.status_code == 402:
+            payment_info = resp.json()
+            amount = (
+                payment_info.get("paymentRequired", {})
+                .get("payment", {})
+                .get("amountUsdc", "0.02")
+            )
+            raise ValueError(
+                f"ThoughtProof requires x402 payment (${amount} USDC on Base). "
+                "Use purl CLI for testing: "
+                f"purl -X POST {api_url} -d '{json.dumps(payload)}'"
+            )
+
+        resp.raise_for_status()
+        return resp.json()
+
+
+# ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
+# Example usage
+# ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
+
+if __name__ == "__main__":
+    print("ThoughtProof Evaluator — reasoning check demo\n")
+
+    # Direct API test (requires x402 payment or purl)
+    test_cases = [
+        ("Buy ETH because influencers say it will moon. FOMO.", "financial", "BLOCK expected"),
+        ("ETH at $2180, 6% below 30d MA, RSI 34. Stop -6%. Target +10%.", "financial", "ALLOW expected"),
+    ]
+
+    for claim, domain, expected in test_cases:
+        print(f"Claim: {claim[:60]}...")
+        print(f"Expected: {expected}")
+        try:
+            result = _check_reasoning(claim, stake_level="low", domain=domain)
+            print(f"Result: {result.get('verdict')} (confidence={result.get('confidence', 0):.2f})")
+        except ValueError as e:
+            print(f"Payment required: {str(e)[:100]}")
+        print()