Context
Same evaluation as #187 — considering ghostty-web for the SSH/Kubernetes terminals in Cloud Foundry Stratos, this time measuring startup under a Content-Security-Policy. Functionally the probe went well: rendering, canvas selection, and the fit() → onResize resize contract all worked. What did not survive is wasm loading under a strict-but-ordinary policy. Full measurements are recorded here.
What happens under connect-src 'self'
Policy used (a fairly common strict baseline, and Stratos's shipped default):
default-src 'self'; script-src 'self'; connect-src 'self'; ...
With ghostty-web@0.4.0, await init() fails in three steps:
- The first candidate the loader tries is the module URL — but in the published bundle the wasm is inlined as a base64
data: URI, so the module-relative URL is a data: URL. fetch() of a data: URL is subject to connect-src, and 'self' blocks it. One CSP violation is logged per load.
- The fallbacks
./ghostty-vt.wasm and /ghostty-vt.wasm resolve against the page, not the module — 404 unless the deployment happens to serve the wasm at the document root.
init() takes no arguments, so there is no way to point the loader at the real file (which does ship in dist/ghostty-vt.wasm).
Result: Error: Failed to fetch WASM: 404 Not Found, and the terminal cannot start at all under a policy that plain xterm.js runs under.
Reading lib/ghostty.ts, the capability already exists one layer down: Ghostty.load(wasmPath?) accepts an explicit path and defaultPaths puts the module-relative URL first — the gap is only that init() does not expose it, and that bundling turns the module-relative default into a data: URI.
Suggestions
- Plumb the path through
init() — init(wasmPath?: string) or init({ wasmUrl }), forwarding to Ghostty.load(). This alone unblocks any CSP-constrained embedder, and it looks like a one-line change given load() already takes it.
- Publish the bundle without inlining the wasm, so the module-relative candidate resolves to the real
dist/ghostty-vt.wasm file — or at least order the same-origin candidates before the data: fallback. Beyond CSP, the inlining also carries ~560KB of base64 in the JS bundle for a 413KB binary that ships in the package anyway, and even when loading eventually succeeds by another route, the data: attempt logs a CSP violation on every page load, which is noise for anyone running violation reporting.
- A docs note on
'wasm-unsafe-eval' — once the fetch succeeds, WebAssembly.compile() still requires script-src to include 'wasm-unsafe-eval'. That one is inherent to running wasm under CSP rather than anything ghostty-web can fix, but a line in the README would save the next embedder the discovery cost.
For what it's worth, with the wasm served at the document root and 'wasm-unsafe-eval' added, everything downstream passed cleanly in our probe — zero style violations, correct rendering, selection and resize all good. The loading path is the only blocker.
Context
Same evaluation as #187 — considering ghostty-web for the SSH/Kubernetes terminals in Cloud Foundry Stratos, this time measuring startup under a Content-Security-Policy. Functionally the probe went well: rendering, canvas selection, and the
fit()→onResizeresize contract all worked. What did not survive is wasm loading under a strict-but-ordinary policy. Full measurements are recorded here.What happens under
connect-src 'self'Policy used (a fairly common strict baseline, and Stratos's shipped default):
With
ghostty-web@0.4.0,await init()fails in three steps:data:URI, so the module-relative URL is adata:URL.fetch()of adata:URL is subject toconnect-src, and'self'blocks it. One CSP violation is logged per load../ghostty-vt.wasmand/ghostty-vt.wasmresolve against the page, not the module — 404 unless the deployment happens to serve the wasm at the document root.init()takes no arguments, so there is no way to point the loader at the real file (which does ship indist/ghostty-vt.wasm).Result:
Error: Failed to fetch WASM: 404 Not Found, and the terminal cannot start at all under a policy that plain xterm.js runs under.Reading
lib/ghostty.ts, the capability already exists one layer down:Ghostty.load(wasmPath?)accepts an explicit path anddefaultPathsputs the module-relative URL first — the gap is only thatinit()does not expose it, and that bundling turns the module-relative default into adata:URI.Suggestions
init()—init(wasmPath?: string)orinit({ wasmUrl }), forwarding toGhostty.load(). This alone unblocks any CSP-constrained embedder, and it looks like a one-line change givenload()already takes it.dist/ghostty-vt.wasmfile — or at least order the same-origin candidates before thedata:fallback. Beyond CSP, the inlining also carries ~560KB of base64 in the JS bundle for a 413KB binary that ships in the package anyway, and even when loading eventually succeeds by another route, thedata:attempt logs a CSP violation on every page load, which is noise for anyone running violation reporting.'wasm-unsafe-eval'— once the fetch succeeds,WebAssembly.compile()still requiresscript-srcto include'wasm-unsafe-eval'. That one is inherent to running wasm under CSP rather than anything ghostty-web can fix, but a line in the README would save the next embedder the discovery cost.For what it's worth, with the wasm served at the document root and
'wasm-unsafe-eval'added, everything downstream passed cleanly in our probe — zero style violations, correct rendering, selection and resize all good. The loading path is the only blocker.