[Question] Harnesses for code review/tour features

[codythatsme]

Hey! Before raising PR's for something you might not want, I was wondering if there was any appetite for expanding the harnesses available for code review mode/code tour etc? Or any reason why only Codex and Claude are currently available here?

I would like to abstract out the "harness/provider" from the feature to make it a bit easier to extend other CLI's to tap into these features.

[backnotprop]

Yeah, definitely need to be able to support other harnesses. Um it just so happens that Claude and Codex both have very robust models around structured outputs. I found it somewhat lacking in the open source harnesses. Where you could give a single prompt instruction and have it act over multiple turns in the final turn required to produce the structured output

[codythatsme]

@backnotprop Interesting, I have had success in my local fork which unifies the entire AI harness interface. Ie, the same harnesses/models etc interfaces used across chat, tour and review, allowing me to use Pi which seems to work well. I'll experiment a bit more to see If I can hit some rough edges before raising a PR. Thankyou!