Skip to content

Suggested Deprecation of Select Military/Paramilitary Domain-Specific Classes #927

Description

@grabusm1

There are several CCO classes that seem to be very domain-specific, and as such, do not seem like good candidates for CCO mid-level ontologies. A few of these are included in the list that follows as higher-priority, given that the way they are modeled and defined continues to cause headaches.

  1. Howitzer (https://www.commoncoreontologies.org/ont00001270)
    Additional Comments: this class excludes self-propelled howitzers, which would be a descendant of Ground Vehicle.

  2. Precision-Guided Missile (https://www.commoncoreontologies.org/ont00001124)
    Additional Comments: One could make the case that not all missiles are precision-guided, and also that whether a missile is precision-guided is context-dependent. What could have been considered “precise” when it was first introduced may no longer meet current expectations for precision, and there is no universally-accepted technical threshold for what it means for the guidance to be precise, especially over time.

  3. Grenade (https://www.commoncoreontologies.org/ont00000310)
    Additional Comments: Not all grenades are weapons, and the extension of the class, as currently defined, is only for hand grenades, excluding grenades that are designed to be projected from special handheld mounted grenade launchers.

  4. Cannon (https://www.commoncoreontologies.org/ont00000268)

  5. Mortar (https://www.commoncoreontologies.org/ont00000340)

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions